Dwell time for HP4195A and HP8563E
Electronics Forum Index Electronics
Circuits, theory, electrons and discussions.
 
 FAQFAQ   MemberlistMemberlist     RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 
 
Google
 
Web ElectronicsHelp.net
Dwell time for HP4195A and HP8563E

 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Electronics Forum Index -> Equipment
Author Message
Larry Martell
Guest





Posted: Fri Dec 02, 2005 1:35 am    Post subject: Dwell time for HP4195A and HP8563E Reply with quote

I am trying to determine what the dwell time is for these instruments.
By dwell time I mean the amount of time it samples the signal for each
data point. This does not appear to be a configurable value, nor does
there seem to be a way to query this value.

For these instruments, is this parameter fixed or variable? If it is
fixed how
do I find out what it is? If it is variable, is it calcualted by simply
dividing the
sweep time by the number of data points?

TIA,
-larry

Back to top
qrk
Guest





Posted: Fri Dec 02, 2005 1:35 am    Post subject: Re: Dwell time for HP4195A and HP8563E Reply with quote

On 1 Dec 2005 14:07:16 -0800, "Larry Martell" <natkelcri@yahoo.com>
wrote:

Quote:
I am trying to determine what the dwell time is for these instruments.
By dwell time I mean the amount of time it samples the signal for each
data point. This does not appear to be a configurable value, nor does
there seem to be a way to query this value.

For these instruments, is this parameter fixed or variable? If it is
fixed how
do I find out what it is? If it is variable, is it calcualted by simply
dividing the
sweep time by the number of data points?

TIA,
-larry

It is indirectly adjustable, at least on the 4195.
The measurement time depends on your resolution bandwidth (Res BW
button) setting. Lower bandwidth setting will take longer to make a
measurement. You can divide the total time by number of points to come
up with an estimate if you use the same bandwidth for all points
(non-auto mode). If you use the Auto Res BW, the resolution bandwidth
will be different for different frequency bands which can speed up the
total measurement time (slow at low freqs, faster at the higher
freqs). If you use the video filter, this will add more time to the
measurement process. On the 4195, you can manually change the
bandwidth in the middle of the sweep if you need to hurry things up or
reduce noise in critical areas.

---
Mark
Back to top
Glenn
Guest





Posted: Fri Dec 02, 2005 1:35 am    Post subject: Re: Dwell time for HP4195A and HP8563E Reply with quote

Larry
I'm not certain about the 856X series but I suspect it is the same as
for the newer analyzers. If so, the way the detector works depends on a
number of factors:
o how fast one is sweeping.
0 detection mode (peak,sample, neg. peak)
0 resolution bandwidth

As the analyzer's LO traverses the spectrum between measurement bins
(each bin of width = span/#measurment points), depending on how the
detector is selected, the A/D takes 1-to-many measurements. Maximum
sweep rate is limited by the need to let the detected signal settle (the
group delay of the RBW filter) and the ability of the LO itself to move
quickly and accurately. For the ESA series, multiple measurements may
be made within each bin. Peak Detect modes just save the max or min
value for the bin. Sample Detect (probably) measures the value at the
center(or end, I 'm not sure) of the bin and throws away any other
measurment. For some analyzers there is a non-sweeping mode wherein the
A/D runs as fast as it can. I think that is a 50 ns measurement time for
ESA.

While there may be no dwell time selection, you may be able to influence
the time spent by judicious selection of span, RBW and sweep time. But
then, the question arises "why do you want to do that?". The SA should
already manage things to avoid over-sweeping, trying to take data faster
than the if filters can handle, and the detection mode selection should
allow you some fleximbility as to whether you're looking at a peak or
sampled mode.

Glenn

Quote:
I am trying to determine what the dwell time is for these instruments.
By dwell time I mean the amount of time it samples the signal for each
data point. This does not appear to be a configurable value, nor does
there seem to be a way to query this value.

For these instruments, is this parameter fixed or variable? If it is
fixed how
do I find out what it is? If it is variable, is it calcualted by simply
dividing the
sweep time by the number of data points?

TIA,
-larry


Back to top
Larry Martell
Guest





Posted: Fri Dec 02, 2005 11:47 pm    Post subject: Re: Dwell time for HP4195A and HP8563E Reply with quote

qrk wrote:
Quote:
On 1 Dec 2005 14:07:16 -0800, "Larry Martell" <natkelcri@yahoo.com
wrote:

I am trying to determine what the dwell time is for these instruments.
By dwell time I mean the amount of time it samples the signal for each
data point. This does not appear to be a configurable value, nor does
there seem to be a way to query this value.

For these instruments, is this parameter fixed or variable? If it is
fixed how
do I find out what it is? If it is variable, is it calcualted by simply
dividing the
sweep time by the number of data points?

TIA,
-larry

It is indirectly adjustable, at least on the 4195.
The measurement time depends on your resolution bandwidth (Res BW
button) setting. Lower bandwidth setting will take longer to make a
measurement. You can divide the total time by number of points to come
up with an estimate if you use the same bandwidth for all points
(non-auto mode). If you use the Auto Res BW, the resolution bandwidth
will be different for different frequency bands which can speed up the
total measurement time (slow at low freqs, faster at the higher
freqs). If you use the video filter, this will add more time to the
measurement process. On the 4195, you can manually change the
bandwidth in the middle of the sweep if you need to hurry things up or
reduce noise in critical areas.

Thanks much for the reply Mark. This is very helpful.

-larry
Back to top
Larry Martell
Guest





Posted: Fri Dec 02, 2005 11:52 pm    Post subject: Re: Dwell time for HP4195A and HP8563E Reply with quote

Glenn wrote:
Quote:
Larry
I'm not certain about the 856X series but I suspect it is the same as
for the newer analyzers. If so, the way the detector works depends on a
number of factors:
o how fast one is sweeping.
0 detection mode (peak,sample, neg. peak)
0 resolution bandwidth

As the analyzer's LO traverses the spectrum between measurement bins
(each bin of width = span/#measurment points), depending on how the
detector is selected, the A/D takes 1-to-many measurements. Maximum
sweep rate is limited by the need to let the detected signal settle (the
group delay of the RBW filter) and the ability of the LO itself to move
quickly and accurately. For the ESA series, multiple measurements may
be made within each bin. Peak Detect modes just save the max or min
value for the bin. Sample Detect (probably) measures the value at the
center(or end, I 'm not sure) of the bin and throws away any other
measurment. For some analyzers there is a non-sweeping mode wherein the
A/D runs as fast as it can. I think that is a 50 ns measurement time for
ESA.

Thanks very much for the info Glenn, it is very hlepful.

Quote:
While there may be no dwell time selection, you may be able to influence
the time spent by judicious selection of span, RBW and sweep time. But
then, the question arises "why do you want to do that?".

I have to perform some EMI emissions tests that have specific dwell
time requirments
(>= 0.15 sec), and I will need to prove to my customer that I am
meeting these.

Thanks!
-larry

Quote:
The SA should
already manage things to avoid over-sweeping, trying to take data faster
than the if filters can handle, and the detection mode selection should
allow you some fleximbility as to whether you're looking at a peak or
sampled mode.

Glenn

I am trying to determine what the dwell time is for these instruments.
By dwell time I mean the amount of time it samples the signal for each
data point. This does not appear to be a configurable value, nor does
there seem to be a way to query this value.

For these instruments, is this parameter fixed or variable? If it is
fixed how
do I find out what it is? If it is variable, is it calcualted by simply
dividing the
sweep time by the number of data points?

TIA,
-larry
Back to top
Glenn
Guest





Posted: Sat Dec 03, 2005 12:23 am    Post subject: Re: Dwell time for HP4195A and HP8563E Reply with quote

Larry


Quote:

While there may be no dwell time selection, you may be able to influence
the time spent by judicious selection of span, RBW and sweep time. But
then, the question arises "why do you want to do that?".


I have to perform some EMI emissions tests that have specific dwell
time requirments
(>= 0.15 sec), and I will need to prove to my customer that I am
meeting these.

OK, that helps. In that case you'll want to use the peak detect mode

(max) and slow the sweep time down to (.15sec/bin * #bins/sweep). That
should get you to .15 seconds within each bin and a measured level
corresponding to the peak within that time. To be thorough, you'll
probably want to make sure that the RBW is set to be at least as wide as
a bin.

Glenn
Back to top
Larry Martell
Guest





Posted: Wed Dec 07, 2005 12:28 am    Post subject: Re: Dwell time for HP4195A and HP8563E Reply with quote

Glenn wrote:
Quote:
Larry



While there may be no dwell time selection, you may be able to influence
the time spent by judicious selection of span, RBW and sweep time. But
then, the question arises "why do you want to do that?".


I have to perform some EMI emissions tests that have specific dwell
time requirments
(>= 0.15 sec), and I will need to prove to my customer that I am
meeting these.

OK, that helps. In that case you'll want to use the peak detect mode
(max) and slow the sweep time down to (.15sec/bin * #bins/sweep). That
should get you to .15 seconds within each bin and a measured level
corresponding to the peak within that time. To be thorough, you'll
probably want to make sure that the RBW is set to be at least as wide as
a bin.

Glenn, thanks very much for the info!

-larry
Back to top
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Electronics Forum Index -> Equipment All times are GMT
Page 1 of 1

 
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum



Home & Living New Topics
Powered by phpBB