Mustafa Umut Sarac
Guest
|
Posted:
Sat Feb 12, 2005 2:39 am Post subject:
Solution for anamorphic camera |
|
|
I want to build a anamorphic pinhole camera.
I use a 2,2 inches high 2,4 inches diameter cylinder as a darkroom of
this camera. And I use 6 cm x 17 cm film. I put the film inside the
cylinder parellel and rolled inside the cylinder. I use a pinhole at
the top of the darkroom. Pinhole creates a cone shaped image on to the
film roll and this takes 360 degrees picture.
Problem , you cant know what u are taking without develop the film , I
mean I need a viewfinder.
And I want to take pictures digitally.
Problem : f is 250 and u need a very slowly scanning array and a
digital information recorder.
I have no laptop and there is no small array scanner and small digital
recorder.
What is the solution ? A low res camera or phototransistor and a mp3
player or mobil ram circuit which records the flying spot scanner data
or what is your realistic solution ?
|
|
Phil Hobbs
Guest
|
Posted:
Sat Feb 12, 2005 3:51 am Post subject:
Re: Solution for anamorphic camera |
|
|
Mustafa Umut Sarac wrote:
| Quote: | I want to build a anamorphic pinhole camera.
I use a 2,2 inches high 2,4 inches diameter cylinder as a darkroom of
this camera. And I use 6 cm x 17 cm film. I put the film inside the
cylinder parellel and rolled inside the cylinder. I use a pinhole at
the top of the darkroom. Pinhole creates a cone shaped image on to the
film roll and this takes 360 degrees picture.
Problem , you cant know what u are taking without develop the film , I
mean I need a viewfinder.
And I want to take pictures digitally.
Problem : f is 250 and u need a very slowly scanning array and a
digital information recorder.
I have no laptop and there is no small array scanner and small digital
recorder.
What is the solution ? A low res camera or phototransistor and a mp3
player or mobil ram circuit which records the flying spot scanner data
or what is your realistic solution ?
Why do you need a viewfinder for a panoramic camera? Just point it in |
the right general direction. An exposure meter, with reciprocity
correction, that I'd believe.
Cheers,
Phil Hobbs |
|