| Author |
Message |
Guest
|
 Posted:
Mon Jan 31, 2005 10:12 am Post subject:
String pot for measuring distance and dynamic motion |
|
|
I have a "stringpot" for sale on Ebay. In case you are not familiar
with one of these, they are an easy way to measure distance accurately.
It is also formally called a linear distance transducer. It is a very
rugged unit, has never been used and sold for $540. If you need to
measure dynamic changes in distances of up to 30 inches, this is one of
the easiest ways to do it. See it here:
http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&rd=1&item=3870244423&ssPageName=STRK:MESE:IT
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
John Nagle
Guest
|
| Posted:
Tue Feb 01, 2005 12:52 am Post subject:
Re: String pot for measuring distance and dynamic motion |
|
|
eganders@yahoo.com wrote: (again)
| Quote: | I have a "stringpot" for sale on Ebay. In case you are not familiar
with one of these, they are an easy way to measure distance accurately.
It is also formally called a linear distance transducer. It is a very
rugged unit, has never been used and sold for $540. If you need to
measure dynamic changes in distances of up to 30 inches, this is one of
the easiest ways to do it. See it here:
|
Once is annoying but tolerable. Twice is spamming.
John Nagle |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
David Harmon
Guest
|
| Posted:
Tue Feb 01, 2005 12:34 pm Post subject:
Re: String pot for measuring distance and dynamic motion |
|
|
On Mon, 31 Jan 2005 18:52:37 GMT in sci.electronics.components, John Nagle <nagle@animats.com> wrote,
| Quote: | eganders@yahoo.com wrote: (again)
I have a "stringpot" for sale on Ebay. In case you are not familiar
with one of these, they are an easy way to measure distance accurately.
It is also formally called a linear distance transducer. It is a very
rugged unit, has never been used and sold for $540. If you need to
measure dynamic changes in distances of up to 30 inches, this is one of
the easiest ways to do it. See it here:
Once is annoying but tolerable. Twice is spamming.
|
But once is still abuse.
None of the newsgroups in the sci.electronics.* hierarchy are intended
for buying and selling. An obvious giveaway is that none of them have
"forsale" or "marketplace" in their name.
See Mark Zenier's guide to the hierarchy, at
ftp://ftp.eskimo.com/u/m/mzenier/seguide9706.txt
When sci.electronics was split back in '95, an associated newsgroup
was created for buying and selling:
misc.industry.electronics.marketplace
http://pages.ebay.com/help/welcome/usenet-policy.html
Quote:
eBay users may not post on Usenet groups (Internet newsgroups) to
advertise eBay or an eBay listing that is inappropriate or violates the
Usenet board policy. If Usenet abuse is reported to eBay, we may among
other remedies remove the listing, issue a warning, or suspend the
user's eBay account.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Watson A.Name - \"Watt Su
Guest
|
| Posted:
Tue Feb 01, 2005 1:10 pm Post subject:
Re: String pot for measuring distance and dynamic motion |
|
|
"John Nagle" <nagle@animats.com> wrote in message
news:V7vLd.9518$8Z1.8142@newssvr14.news.prodigy.com...
| Quote: | eganders@yahoo.com wrote: (again)
I have a "stringpot" for sale on Ebay. In case you are not familiar
with one of these, they are an easy way to measure distance
accurately.
It is also formally called a linear distance transducer. It is a
very
rugged unit, has never been used and sold for $540. If you need to
measure dynamic changes in distances of up to 30 inches, this is one
of
the easiest ways to do it. See it here:
Once is annoying but tolerable. Twice is spamming.
|
No, spamming is when it exceeds the Breitbart Index, and it takes more
than two to exceed it. It's a complicated formula for determining spam.
> John Nagle |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
David Harmon
Guest
|
| Posted:
Tue Feb 01, 2005 10:56 pm Post subject:
Re: String pot for measuring distance and dynamic motion |
|
|
On Mon, 31 Jan 2005 23:10:37 -0800 in sci.electronics.components,
"Watson A.Name - \"Watt Sun, the Dark Remover\"" wrote,
| Quote: | Once is annoying but tolerable. Twice is spamming.
No, spamming is when it exceeds the Breitbart Index, and it takes more
than two to exceed it. It's a complicated formula for determining spam.
|
No, exceeding BI=20 is when it is generally recognized that the
spamming is so egregious that third party canceling is justified.
http://www.killfile.org/~tskirvin/faqs/spam.html
Twice is still spamming.
(emailed by mistake... my apologies for that.) |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
|
|
FAQ
Memberlist
Register
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in