| Author |
Message |
Guest
|
 Posted:
Thu Mar 03, 2005 6:11 am Post subject:
Self monitoring |
|
|
Monitoring by professionals is not required they have a great call
true police delay of 2 hours.
The usual arguments of monitoring stations are that they are
available all the time, they apply standard procedures with your
authorization and some phone numbers you have to provide of persons
they can contact and more...
How do i reject theyre "not reachable" argumentation?
When an alarm is detected i dial 2 numbers:
- my cell phone
- the place where the alarm is originated from, my home.
Why ?
Well when I'm not reachable for action (at the theater for instance
or for any other reason) i redirect my alarm phone-line
"conditionally" (line busy) to an alternative person who has been
informed prior and agree to take action to warn police of an
ongoing alarm and monitor theyre presence acknowledge.
I can redirect the alarm phone number (and check presence) of the
involved person:
- with my home-phone before i leave
- with my cell phone at any time and place;
When I'm not reachable on my cell-phone, i will know exactly who is
involved for action.
I repeat for the "deaf pro's", no direct personal intervention, police
will do it and theyre (re)action time will be monitored by a truly and
well defined person for true information.
How good will you feel when you elect an all included out of your
control standard handling procedure by a monitoring station to protect
your belongings?
Think it over.
Paul
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Guest
|
| Posted:
Thu Mar 03, 2005 2:15 pm Post subject:
Re: Self monitoring |
|
|
| isiwyg jep eps wich are darn gawd noying toyz... |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
petem
Guest
|
| Posted:
Thu Mar 03, 2005 5:37 pm Post subject:
Re: Self monitoring |
|
|
Hey paul why do you change your name so often?
I don't wan to see anything post any you cause its non sense...
and since people that block you don't want to discuss with you,at least if
you want to flood the group with your post let the people that already made
there choice and WONT change it alone..And ill post it in French so that you
understand....
paul ne change plus ton noms...les gens qui ne sont pas interresser par tes
aneries te blocque et ne veulent pas te lire...Au moins respect ca....il ne
changeront pas d'idee
<-paul@swing_be-> a écrit dans le message de news:
e29d215nioo7qnkol6jqpsc8cql3mld5qq@4ax.com...
| Quote: |
Monitoring by professionals is not required they have a great call
true police delay of 2 hours.
The usual arguments of monitoring stations are that they are
available all the time, they apply standard procedures with your
authorization and some phone numbers you have to provide of persons
they can contact and more...
How do i reject theyre "not reachable" argumentation?
When an alarm is detected i dial 2 numbers:
- my cell phone
- the place where the alarm is originated from, my home.
Why ?
Well when I'm not reachable for action (at the theater for instance
or for any other reason) i redirect my alarm phone-line
"conditionally" (line busy) to an alternative person who has been
informed prior and agree to take action to warn police of an
ongoing alarm and monitor theyre presence acknowledge.
I can redirect the alarm phone number (and check presence) of the
involved person:
- with my home-phone before i leave
- with my cell phone at any time and place;
When I'm not reachable on my cell-phone, i will know exactly who is
involved for action.
I repeat for the "deaf pro's", no direct personal intervention, police
will do it and theyre (re)action time will be monitored by a truly and
well defined person for true information.
How good will you feel when you elect an all included out of your
control standard handling procedure by a monitoring station to protect
your belongings?
Think it over.
Paul
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Aegis
Guest
|
| Posted:
Fri Mar 04, 2005 6:11 am Post subject:
Re: Self monitoring |
|
|
<-paul@swing_be-> wrote in message
news:e29d215nioo7qnkol6jqpsc8cql3mld5qq@4ax.com...
| Quote: |
Monitoring by professionals is not required they have a great call
true police delay of 2 hours.
The usual arguments of monitoring stations are that they are
available all the time, they apply standard procedures with your
authorization and some phone numbers you have to provide of persons
they can contact and more...
How do i reject theyre "not reachable" argumentation?
When an alarm is detected i dial 2 numbers:
- my cell phone
- the place where the alarm is originated from, my home.
Why ?
Well when I'm not reachable for action (at the theater for instance
or for any other reason) i redirect my alarm phone-line
"conditionally" (line busy) to an alternative person who has been
informed prior and agree to take action to warn police of an
ongoing alarm and monitor theyre presence acknowledge.
I can redirect the alarm phone number (and check presence) of the
involved person:
- with my home-phone before i leave
- with my cell phone at any time and place;
When I'm not reachable on my cell-phone, i will know exactly who is
involved for action.
|
Yeah right... Every time you go to the theater, you are going to "appoint"
an individual? So a friend sees you on the street and wants you to go with
him to catch a movie, but you have to say no because you haven't performed
your "appointment" process yet? Ok... Fiction, of course, since you can't
possibly have friends.
| Quote: |
I repeat for the "deaf pro's", no direct personal intervention, police
will do it and theyre (re)action time will be monitored by a truly and
well defined person for true information.
How good will you feel when you elect an all included out of your
control standard handling procedure by a monitoring station to protect
your belongings?
Think it over.
Paul
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
|
|
FAQ
Memberlist
Register
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in