DMM Frequency response
Electronics Forum Index Electronics
Circuits, theory, electrons and discussions.
 
 FAQFAQ   MemberlistMemberlist     RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 
 
Google
 
Web ElectronicsHelp.net
DMM Frequency response

 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Electronics Forum Index -> Basics
Author Message
shan
Guest





Posted: Sun Nov 13, 2005 5:16 pm    Post subject: DMM Frequency response Reply with quote

Hi, everyone! I'm new to here.

I have some questions about measuring AC voltages.

I know that low-cost DMMs cannot measure accurately the AC (rms)
voltage for too high frequency normally below several hundred Hz even
for sinusoidal signal. But why? Is it due to the electronics inside or
is it a loading effect?

What above analog multimeters? Are they better/worse?

Besides the internal resistance ~ 10Mohm, what are the typical parallel
capacitance / series inductance values across a DMM inputs? Is it
normally neccessary to take these into account?

Thanks!

Back to top
Charles Schuler
Guest





Posted: Mon Nov 14, 2005 1:35 am    Post subject: Re: DMM Frequency response Reply with quote

"shan" <shan.hello@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1131880577.892349.58920@g47g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
Quote:
Hi, everyone! I'm new to here.

I have some questions about measuring AC voltages.

I know that low-cost DMMs cannot measure accurately the AC (rms)
voltage for too high frequency normally below several hundred Hz even
for sinusoidal signal. But why? Is it due to the electronics inside or
is it a loading effect?

What above analog multimeters? Are they better/worse?

Besides the internal resistance ~ 10Mohm, what are the typical parallel
capacitance / series inductance values across a DMM inputs? Is it
normally neccessary to take these into account?

If a DMM has an input impedance of 10 M Ohms and 20 pF, the 3 dB frequency
is 1/(2piRC) = 800 Hz. The capacitance in this case is a shunt effect to
ground after the 10 Megs of resistance ... so it forms a low-pass filter.

A 1 volt signal at 800 Hz will display as 0.7 volts.

Scopes are better for higher frequencies.
Back to top
shan
Guest





Posted: Mon Nov 14, 2005 5:35 pm    Post subject: Re: DMM Frequency response Reply with quote

So, the equivalent circuit is something like this?

-----\/\/\/\/----- Vdmm
Vin R |
C =
|
-------------------

If we put DC voltage across the inputs why not the DC voltage shows up
(in AC measurement mode)?

How scopes and other more sophisticated devices do? How to represent
the these as equivalent circuit?

Thanks very much!

Back to top
Tim Williams
Guest





Posted: Mon Nov 14, 2005 5:35 pm    Post subject: Re: DMM Frequency response Reply with quote

"shan" <shan.hello@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1131973983.966724.98470@g43g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
Quote:
If we put DC voltage across the inputs why not the DC voltage shows up
(in AC measurement mode)?

Because it's made to ignore DC potential...

My RadioShank DMM (before it died...sigh) started dropping off at 3kHz,
based on my observations.

Tim

--
Deep Fryer: a very philosophical monk.
Website: http://webpages.charter.net/dawill/tmoranwms
Back to top
Charles Schuler
Guest





Posted: Tue Nov 15, 2005 1:35 am    Post subject: Re: DMM Frequency response Reply with quote

"shan" <shan.hello@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1131973983.966724.98470@g43g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
Quote:
So, the equivalent circuit is something like this?

-----\/\/\/\/----- Vdmm
Vin R |
C =
|
-------------------

Yes.


Quote:
If we put DC voltage across the inputs why not the DC voltage shows up
(in AC measurement mode)?

There is a series blocking capacitor.

Quote:
How scopes and other more sophisticated devices do?

It's selectable on a scope ... dc coupling (no blocking capacitor) ... or ac
coupling (capacitor). dc coupling is also called direct coupling.
Back to top
Jasen Betts
Guest





Posted: Tue Nov 15, 2005 1:46 pm    Post subject: Re: DMM Frequency response Reply with quote

On 2005-11-13, Charles Schuler <charleschuler@comcast.net> wrote:

Quote:
If a DMM has an input impedance of 10 M Ohms and 20 pF, the 3 dB frequency
is 1/(2piRC) = 800 Hz. The capacitance in this case is a shunt effect to
ground after the 10 Megs of resistance ... so it forms a low-pass filter.

A 1 volt signal at 800 Hz will display as 0.7 volts.

Scopes are better for higher frequencies.

couldn't they bypass the 10M with a suitable cap to reduce that ?

wether the DMM can sample the input fast enoug could be another problem..


Bye.
Jasen
Back to top
shan
Guest





Posted: Tue Nov 15, 2005 5:35 pm    Post subject: Re: DMM Frequency response Reply with quote

"Charles Schuler" <charleschuler@comcast.net> wrote in
news:4KKdnfM4UJujaOXeRVn-vw@comcast.com:

Quote:
So, the equivalent circuit is something like this?

-----\/\/\/\/----- Vdmm
Vin R |
C =
|
-------------------

Yes.

If we put DC voltage across the inputs why not the DC voltage shows
up (in AC measurement mode)?

There is a series blocking capacitor.


If we add a series cap (denoted it as C1) at Vin, there should still be
DC voltage across C. Maybe C1>>C so that most voltage is on C1? By the
way what is the typical capacitance needed for DC blocking? What are the
main considerations?

Quote:
How scopes and other more sophisticated devices do?

It's selectable on a scope ... dc coupling (no blocking capacitor) ...
or ac coupling (capacitor). dc coupling is also called direct
coupling.

Even we can select dc/ac coupling, it only deals with the DC component,
how can it avoid low-pass phenomenen? It should not be simple otherwise
all cheap DMMs can do this, I suppose?

Thanks.
Back to top
shan
Guest





Posted: Tue Nov 15, 2005 5:35 pm    Post subject: Re: DMM Frequency response Reply with quote

Jasen Betts <jasen@clunker.homenet> wrote in
news:slrndnj4is.5cc.jasen@clunker.homenet:

Quote:
couldn't they bypass the 10M with a suitable cap to reduce that ?

wether the DMM can sample the input fast enoug could be another
problem..


Bye.
Jasen


If they bypass 10M, I think the impedance may be too low.
Back to top
Charles Schuler
Guest





Posted: Wed Nov 16, 2005 1:35 am    Post subject: Re: DMM Frequency response Reply with quote

"shan" <shan_(dot)_hello_(at)_gmail_(dot)_com> wrote in message
news:Xns9710D1DD61C6shan@216.168.3.30...
Quote:
"Charles Schuler" <charleschuler@comcast.net> wrote in
news:4KKdnfM4UJujaOXeRVn-vw@comcast.com:

So, the equivalent circuit is something like this?

-----\/\/\/\/----- Vdmm
Vin R |
C =
|
-------------------

Yes.

If we put DC voltage across the inputs why not the DC voltage shows
up (in AC measurement mode)?

There is a series blocking capacitor.


If we add a series cap (denoted it as C1) at Vin, there should still be
DC voltage across C. Maybe C1>>C so that most voltage is on C1? By the
way what is the typical capacitance needed for DC blocking? What are the
main considerations?

You are thinking about the distribution of a dc voltage across two
capacitors in series ... does not apply here. The capacitor is selected to
have a low reactance at the lowest frequency of interest. At dc, 0 Hz, its
reactance is infinite; hence the dc blocking function.
Back to top
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Electronics Forum Index -> Basics All times are GMT
Page 1 of 1

 
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum



Home & Living New Topics
Contact Us
Powered by phpBB