Inductance Measurement
Electronics Forum Index Electronics
Circuits, theory, electrons and discussions.
 
 FAQFAQ   MemberlistMemberlist     RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 
 
Google
 
Web ElectronicsHelp.net
Inductance Measurement

 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Electronics Forum Index -> Basics
Author Message
Larry Kirkland
Guest





Posted: Sat Jan 29, 2005 3:28 am    Post subject: Inductance Measurement Reply with quote

I have a General Radio 1650A Impedance Bridge. It has two positions for
measuring unknown inductance, Lp (parallel inductance) and Ls (series
inductance). The book is not clear as to the differences. I can get
significant differences when measuring the same coil on the two settings.

The book says that Ls equals Lp within 1% when the Q of the coil is
greater than 10. The coils I'm measuring have a Q of less than 10 at
the bridge frequency of 1 Khz (2 or 3). Which scale should I use? What
am I missing here?

Thanks
Larry

Back to top
John Popelish
Guest





Posted: Sat Jan 29, 2005 4:13 am    Post subject: Re: Inductance Measurement Reply with quote

Larry Kirkland wrote:
Quote:

I have a General Radio 1650A Impedance Bridge. It has two positions for
measuring unknown inductance, Lp (parallel inductance) and Ls (series
inductance). The book is not clear as to the differences. I can get
significant differences when measuring the same coil on the two settings.

The book says that Ls equals Lp within 1% when the Q of the coil is
greater than 10. The coils I'm measuring have a Q of less than 10 at
the bridge frequency of 1 Khz (2 or 3). Which scale should I use? What
am I missing here?

Thanks
Larry

Parallel resistance is normally caused by core losses. Air core coils
generally have their losses dominated by the wire series resistance.
You should be able to compare the DC resistance to Rs and see if they
agree fairly closely. If so, then the series resistance approximation
is the way to go. If there is a big discrepancy between DC resistance
and Rs then parallel loss will probably give a better measure of
inductance.

--
John Popelish
Back to top
Fred Abse
Guest





Posted: Sun Jan 30, 2005 5:24 pm    Post subject: Re: Inductance Measurement Reply with quote

On Fri, 28 Jan 2005 21:28:42 +0000, Larry Kirkland wrote:

Quote:
I have a General Radio 1650A Impedance Bridge. It has two positions for
measuring unknown inductance, Lp (parallel inductance) and Ls (series
inductance). The book is not clear as to the differences. I can get
significant differences when measuring the same coil on the two settings.

The book says that Ls equals Lp within 1% when the Q of the coil is
greater than 10. The coils I'm measuring have a Q of less than 10 at the
bridge frequency of 1 Khz (2 or 3). Which scale should I use? What am I
missing here?

Any combination of reactance (inductive or capacitive) and resistance may
be represented as either a perfect reactance and resistance in series, or
a perfect reactance and resistance in parallel. The values of both
reactance and resistance in each case are *not* equal. The values of
reactance in each case become close when Q>10.

With a Q between 2 and 3, the values of series and parallel reactance,
hence inductance will differ significantly.

Which value to use? It all depends... In the case of small, air-cored
coils, it is usual to use the series case. With big, iron-cored coils, the
parallel case is usual.

Google for "hay maxwell bridge" - plenty of information.

Also try googling for "series parallel impedance conversion"

Omit the quotes in both cases.

--
Then there's duct tape ...
(Garrison Keillor)

Back to top
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Electronics Forum Index -> Basics All times are GMT
Page 1 of 1

 
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum



Home & Living New Topics
Powered by phpBB