Guest
|
 Posted:
Wed Jun 22, 2005 8:36 am Post subject:
41. Nose leading... Leg twisting... Pro's |
|
|
So called "hands-on pro's" always attempt to justify the reliability
of wireless alarm systems without manufacturer specifications and
support.
Its so simple to have the manufacturer specify / warrant theyre
product reliability against Radio Frequency Interferences (RFI)..
Who knows better than the product designer, -tester, -producer?
Why do manufacturers not specify that attempt of "hands-on pro's" who
explain a imaginative RFI detection system?
Does the salesman;
Does the installer;
or
Does the monitoring agent know better?
They seems to be the only who know that the night owl cry (RFI
detection) don't exist; NO ALARM during RFI, but they don't tell that
to everybody!
Who attempt purchaser "nose leading", some call that "Leg twisting"?
At least it seems that I succeed with the "so called" alarm pro's and
they're imaginative unsuccessful and unjustified statements subject
wireless alarm systems reliability during RFI.
By the way, do somebody have a small tool called "nose players", it
will allow to twist "so called" pro's verbal juice even more.
I don't think that you have "nose players" oversees but its not
required, it seems that you have "jumping beans" instead...
A lot of "jumping beans" are present in this NG at least.
|
|
FAQ
Memberlist
Register
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in