|.........
Guest
|
 Posted:
Wed Feb 02, 2005 11:01 am Post subject:
14/ Wireless unreliability, upset Pro's |
|
|
What does upset Pro's in this news group when i say that wireless
alarm systems are unreliable during RFI ?
Well look at theyre childish answers (instead of providing
professional arguments) they try to ridicule, mono-bit/mono-lingual
persons language battle, they tell you everything, the most stupid
first, .. Usual low level electrician behavior who think they have to
battle to defend theyre position.
Look around when you are in the industry, fighting is a typical
attitude of the lower education class persons.
Where are manufacturers counter arguments ?
Why do manufacturers not provide data about the main difference
between wired and wireless: the wireless data loop between sensors and
the control panel ?
Because it can't be resolved in the actual FCC allowed frequency
space, to crowded, to limited in band size and used free without
interference warranty and control.
NOTE: there is a pro who told me that there is no "data loop" in a
wireless system... well he is right, there is no RFI resolving loop in
the system, its a one direction data handling from sensor to control
panel... there are more and more stupid posts from pro's in this NG
who don't answer or provide any arguments, this is an example between
many, pinpointing / pissing contest attitudes...
Now the pro's tend to let you believe that there is a RFI detection
circuit, its in fact a sensor malfunction control and it don't resolve
the RFI problem.
Well it don't, the receiver is still muzzled and the alarm system
don't provide any valid output data to tell that an intruder is
present and detected.
Theyre new objective is to deviate the discussion from the main
problem, RFI muzzling..
Good strategy? Well stupid executer attitude, it don't solve anything
but it may impress some owners or future owners of wireless alarm
systems who think that they know... They have experience and don't
need any tool to "see" the wireless loop solution.
Nevertheless, wireless alarm systems are UNRELIABLE DURING
INTERFERENCE, pro's at several instances have admitted that but they
don't like to talk about it, they prefers to fight against what i say
instead of arguing (recall what i said here above, a typical executer
attitude who tend to force theyre position).
Paul
|
|
Guest
|
| Posted:
Wed Feb 02, 2005 6:26 pm Post subject:
Re: 14/ Wireless unreliability, upset Pro's |
|
|
so peanutes and jeely with momsy, i tought we waz having gingy thouh
brussel sprout, yoh momsy and sis say they await the tally hennt in the
sprout city...
yours~ muzeell head
|......... wrote:
| Quote: | What does upset Pro's in this news group when i say that wireless
alarm systems are unreliable during RFI ?
Well look at theyre childish answers (instead of providing
professional arguments) they try to ridicule, mono-bit/mono-lingual
persons language battle, they tell you everything, the most stupid
first, .. Usual low level electrician behavior who think they have to
battle to defend theyre position.
Look around when you are in the industry, fighting is a typical
attitude of the lower education class persons.
Where are manufacturers counter arguments ?
Why do manufacturers not provide data about the main difference
between wired and wireless: the wireless data loop between sensors
and
the control panel ?
Because it can't be resolved in the actual FCC allowed frequency
space, to crowded, to limited in band size and used free without
interference warranty and control.
NOTE: there is a pro who told me that there is no "data loop" in a
wireless system... well he is right, there is no RFI resolving loop
in
the system, its a one direction data handling from sensor to control
panel... there are more and more stupid posts from pro's in this NG
who don't answer or provide any arguments, this is an example between
many, pinpointing / pissing contest attitudes...
Now the pro's tend to let you believe that there is a RFI detection
circuit, its in fact a sensor malfunction control and it don't
resolve
the RFI problem.
Well it don't, the receiver is still muzzled and the alarm system
don't provide any valid output data to tell that an intruder is
present and detected.
Theyre new objective is to deviate the discussion from the main
problem, RFI muzzling..
Good strategy? Well stupid executer attitude, it don't solve anything
but it may impress some owners or future owners of wireless alarm
systems who think that they know... They have experience and don't
need any tool to "see" the wireless loop solution.
Nevertheless, wireless alarm systems are UNRELIABLE DURING
INTERFERENCE, pro's at several instances have admitted that but they
don't like to talk about it, they prefers to fight against what i say
instead of arguing (recall what i said here above, a typical executer
attitude who tend to force theyre position).
Paul |
|
|
FAQ
Memberlist
Register
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in