20. RFI is an unavoidable nuisances for wireless alarm syst
Electronics Forum Index Electronics
Circuits, theory, electrons and discussions.
 
 FAQFAQ   MemberlistMemberlist     RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 
 
Google
 
Web ElectronicsHelp.net
20. RFI is an unavoidable nuisances for wireless alarm syst

 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Electronics Forum Index -> Security
Author Message
Guest






Posted: Sat May 28, 2005 12:36 am    Post subject: 20. RFI is an unavoidable nuisances for wireless alarm syst Reply with quote

I showed that RFI is an unavoidable nuisances for wireless alarm
systems in several posts.
I had a case who muzzled my wireless alarm system for
more than 1 year before i discovered it by accident, no warning.
By measuring i found the original source of RFI, my wireless
headphone;

Notice that there was no warning and that pro's confirm, 20+ years of
theyre experience = no RFI warning.

I also have explained how wireless alarm system radio data is send
from sensors to the receiver and how it is jeopardized by collisions
and interferences.
I mentioned too that the frequencies used by wireless alarm systems
are authority interference unprotected ones and of free use by anybody
(you, car keys, light dimmers, headphones (the worst) and more).

I DON'T SELL any alarm system but can't admit, like i was induced in
error, that owners and future owners are mislead on the subject by low
level mechanics who have not the most elementary clue on radio
communication.
The only reaction where insults.. but coming from low level hammer
and cleaning cloth handlers, it will mot muzzle me.

WHY do manufacturers not provide any specification on theyre wireless
data communication loop; its the only thing who is different in
comparisons to wired systems.
Why do they not specify wireless receiver and transmitter data on
theyre wireless goodies or is it junk?

Back to top
Roger
Guest





Posted: Tue May 31, 2005 11:55 pm    Post subject: Re: 20. RFI is an unavoidable nuisances for wireless alarm Reply with quote

No. You didn't 'show'... you said. Very different thing. By the way, you're
stupid :-)


<-pull@shoot> wrote in message
news:139f91hvab1v58q8nqkrihenm82omi317j@4ax.com...
Quote:

I showed that RFI is an unavoidable nuisances for wireless alarm
systems in several posts.
I had a case who muzzled my wireless alarm system for
more than 1 year before i discovered it by accident, no warning.
By measuring i found the original source of RFI, my wireless
headphone;

Notice that there was no warning and that pro's confirm, 20+ years of
theyre experience = no RFI warning.

I also have explained how wireless alarm system radio data is send
from sensors to the receiver and how it is jeopardized by collisions
and interferences.
I mentioned too that the frequencies used by wireless alarm systems
are authority interference unprotected ones and of free use by anybody
(you, car keys, light dimmers, headphones (the worst) and more).

I DON'T SELL any alarm system but can't admit, like i was induced in
error, that owners and future owners are mislead on the subject by low
level mechanics who have not the most elementary clue on radio
communication.
The only reaction where insults.. but coming from low level hammer
and cleaning cloth handlers, it will mot muzzle me.

WHY do manufacturers not provide any specification on theyre wireless
data communication loop; its the only thing who is different in
comparisons to wired systems.
Why do they not specify wireless receiver and transmitter data on
theyre wireless goodies or is it junk?
Back to top
Guest






Posted: Sat Jul 02, 2005 2:30 pm    Post subject: Re: 20. RFI is an unavoidable nuisances for wireless alarm Reply with quote

On Sat, 28 May 2005 00:54:48 +0200, -pull@shoot wrote:

Quote:

I showed that RFI is an unavoidable nuisances for wireless alarm
systems in several posts.
I had a case who muzzled my wireless alarm system for
more than 1 year before i discovered it by accident, no warning.
By measuring i found the original source of RFI, my wireless
headphone;

Notice that there was no warning and that pro's confirm, 20+ years of
theyre experience = no RFI warning.

I also have explained how wireless alarm system radio data is send
from sensors to the receiver and how it is jeopardized by collisions
and interferences.
I mentioned too that the frequencies used by wireless alarm systems
are authority interference unprotected ones and of free use by anybody
(you, car keys, light dimmers, headphones (the worst) and more).

I DON'T SELL any alarm system but can't admit, like i was induced in
error, that owners and future owners are mislead on the subject by low
level mechanics who have not the most elementary clue on radio
communication.
The only reaction where insults.. but coming from low level hammer
and cleaning cloth handlers, it will mot muzzle me.

WHY do manufacturers not provide any specification on theyre wireless
data communication loop; its the only thing who is different in
comparisons to wired systems.
Why do they not specify wireless receiver and transmitter data on
theyre wireless goodies or is it junk?


Back to top
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Electronics Forum Index -> Security All times are GMT
Page 1 of 1

 
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum



Home & Living New Topics
Powered by phpBB