| Author |
Message |
|.........
Guest
|
Posted:
Sun Jan 16, 2005 12:45 pm Post subject:
Re: Wireless unreliability, upset Pro's |
|
|
On Sun, 16 Jan 2005 01:33:15 GMT, "BigWallop"
<spam.guard@_spam_guard.com> wrote:
| Quote: | The best tool to tell the alarm, any alarm, is your body and the setting
"Walk Test" that all current systems have installed as standard. It soon
tells you if the system is working or not.
|
Can you do that 7/7 and 24/24 because RFI can occur at any time.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
G. Morgan
Guest
|
Posted:
Sun Jan 16, 2005 1:00 pm Post subject:
Re: Wireless unreliability, upset Pro's |
|
|
Paul the retard came up with this:
| Quote: |
Professional say they have experiance and feeling!
RFI probe
\ /
____\/____
/ ___ ___ \
/ / @ \/ @ \ \
\ \___/\___/ /\
\____\/____/||
| |
| | Pro's in
/ \ Pissing
/ \ Contest
| |
| |
| ooo. 10 mW
| OO \ output
| | power!
| / o
\________/ o
|| || \___,,,__ /
|| || | WAS |O
_||_||_ \________/
|
LOL!! Every time Paul is told to get fucked he draws a picture of an owl.
| Quote: | That is even not the prefered image pro's give from themself, they
called alarm installers idiots, stupid, monkeys, imbeciles, morons,
BULL SHIT...
|
That's what your buddy Bass calls us.
--
-Graham
Remove the 'snails' from my email |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Guest
|
Posted:
Sun Jan 16, 2005 3:07 pm Post subject:
Re: Wireless unreliability, upset Pro's |
|
|
cant handle it, i guess you live in a safe country, here we need bars
and razor wire, nothing stupid about that, its called protection fool!!
No, we install systems in poor (and I mean poor - you ever seen those
pictures of eheopia? then imagine that - where Iive) poor peoples
shacks here, and no we never install wireless in them, you know why,
cause its much more expensive.
like i said, Unless the client is the government, military,
or has unsually expensive items ($billions) in their home, no criminal
is going to go through trying to jam a wireless alarm, when there are
many other ways to disable it or any alarm, or get by it.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|.........
Guest
|
Posted:
Sun Jan 16, 2005 3:26 pm Post subject:
Re: Wireless unreliability, upset Pro's |
|
|
On 16 Jan 2005 01:07:52 -0800, rory@aspbahamas.com wrote:
| Quote: | like i said, Unless the client is the government, military,
or has unsually expensive items ($billions) in their home, no criminal
is going to go through trying to jam a wireless alarm, when there are
many other ways to disable it or any alarm, or get by it.
|
Of course, intruders don't have to go to special equipment and skill,
the surrounding environment muzzle the wireless alarm systems by
themselves and you don't know it.
That's the danger of wireless, you think that you are protected and
you aren't (un voluntary OR voluntary RFI).
Recall, the wireless alarm frequencies are NOT PROTECTED against RFI
and free of use by anyone. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Guest
|
Posted:
Sun Jan 16, 2005 3:36 pm Post subject:
Re: Wireless unreliability, upset Pro's |
|
|
// Recall, the wireless alarm frequencies are NOT PROTECTED against RFI
and free of use by anyone.//
i think everyone got your point by now ... no matter what theirs or
your views are .. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|.........
Guest
|
Posted:
Sun Jan 16, 2005 4:01 pm Post subject:
Re: Wireless unreliability, upset Pro's |
|
|
On 16 Jan 2005 01:36:03 -0800, rory@aspbahamas.com wrote:
| Quote: | // Recall, the wireless alarm frequencies are NOT PROTECTED against RFI
and free of use by anyone.//
i think everyone got your point by now ... no matter what theirs or
your views are ..
|
It seems that you and others forget the most elementary basics. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Guest
|
Posted:
Sun Jan 16, 2005 4:30 pm Post subject:
Re: Wireless unreliability, upset Pro's |
|
|
| i really dont care, go tell it to someone that gives a rats ass! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
|
|