| Author |
Message |
Guest
|
 Posted:
Tue Feb 01, 2005 3:18 am Post subject:
Active HIGH / Active LOW |
|
|
Hi,
There chips with the mixture of Active HIGH and Active LOW signals. Is
there any pros and cons of each levels? OR it simply choice of
designers / manufacturers?
Thanks in advance.
Regards,
Muthu
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
glen herrmannsfeldt
Guest
|
| Posted:
Tue Feb 01, 2005 3:34 am Post subject:
Re: Active HIGH / Active LOW |
|
|
muthusnv@rediffmail.com wrote:
| Quote: | There chips with the mixture of Active HIGH and Active LOW signals. Is
there any pros and cons of each levels? OR it simply choice of
designers / manufacturers?
|
I believe for TTL there is some advantage to active low for
enables and such. TTL has much better current sinks than
current sources. I don't believe the advantage is as big,
if any, for CMOS but may have been kept for backward
compatibility reasons.
-- glen |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
CWatters
Guest
|
| Posted:
Tue Feb 01, 2005 3:37 am Post subject:
Re: Active HIGH / Active LOW |
|
|
<muthusnv@rediffmail.com> wrote in message
news:1107206334.599924.199870@c13g2000cwb.googlegroups.com...
| Quote: | Hi,
There chips with the mixture of Active HIGH and Active LOW signals.
OR it simply choice of designers / manufacturers?
|
Yes the designer can define a signal to be active High or active Low - it's
his choice.
However... In general P type devices switch slower than N type. This means
that many devices have slightly different rise and fall times - eg the fall
time 5V->0V is faster than the rise time 0V->5V. This means that if you need
a fast edge for a signal (lets call it a "Ready" signal) then you use the
falling edge because thats faster. Therefore its natural to define Ready =
True = 0V. That makes it an Active Low signal.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
CWatters
Guest
|
| Posted:
Tue Feb 01, 2005 3:40 am Post subject:
Re: Active HIGH / Active LOW |
|
|
"glen herrmannsfeldt" <gah@ugcs.caltech.edu> wrote in message
news:ctm8dm$vib$1@gnus01.u.washington.edu...
| Quote: | muthusnv@rediffmail.com wrote:
There chips with the mixture of Active HIGH and Active LOW signals. Is
there any pros and cons of each levels? OR it simply choice of
designers / manufacturers?
I believe for TTL there is some advantage to active low for
enables and such. TTL has much better current sinks than
current sources. I don't believe the advantage is as big,
if any, for CMOS but may have been kept for backward
compatibility reasons.
|
I may be out of date but... it used to be the case that P type devices were
roughly half as fast as N type. They got the edges symetrical in CMOS logic
families by making the P channel FET twice the size of the N channel FET. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Georgi Beloev
Guest
|
| Posted:
Tue Feb 01, 2005 5:18 am Post subject:
Re: Active HIGH / Active LOW |
|
|
muthusnv@rediffmail.com wrote:
| Quote: | Hi,
There chips with the mixture of Active HIGH and Active LOW signals. Is
there any pros and cons of each levels? OR it simply choice of
designers / manufacturers?
Thanks in advance.
Regards,
Muthu
|
Unconnected TTL inputs are interpreted as logic high. Hence it is more
convenient to define the active level of control signals as logic low
and allow the designers to simply not connect the pins carrying those
signals if they don't need them. Also, if a cable is unplugged from a
board the inputs read high (not active) and the board does not attempt
to do anything unexpected.
Active low is also commonly used for signals with multiple drivers,
e.g., interrupt request lines. In this case there is a pull-up resistor
and open-collector or open-drain drivers that pull the singnal low.
My 2c.
-- Georgi |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
|
|
FAQ
Memberlist
Register
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in