Serial or Parallel ADC?
Electronics Forum Index Electronics
Circuits, theory, electrons and discussions.
 
 FAQFAQ   MemberlistMemberlist     RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 
 
Google
 
Web ElectronicsHelp.net
Serial or Parallel ADC?

 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Electronics Forum Index -> Basics
Author Message
Jack// ani
Guest





Posted: Thu Mar 24, 2005 7:10 pm    Post subject: Serial or Parallel ADC? Reply with quote

Hi all,

I want to interface my PIC uC with external ADC, I want to know which
is more easy and better a serial ADC or a parallel ADC?

Thanks

Back to top
Lord Garth
Guest





Posted: Thu Mar 24, 2005 7:10 pm    Post subject: Re: Serial or Parallel ADC? Reply with quote

"Jack// ani" <nospam4u_jack@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1111688607.582963.51980@l41g2000cwc.googlegroups.com...
Quote:
Hi all,

I want to interface my PIC uC with external ADC, I want to know which
is more easy and better a serial ADC or a parallel ADC?

Thanks


If the uC has a serial port, that would be easier but the rate at which you
could read the conversion results will be faster with a parallel ADC.
Back to top
Rene Tschaggelar
Guest





Posted: Thu Mar 24, 2005 7:10 pm    Post subject: Re: Serial or Parallel ADC? Reply with quote

Jack// ani wrote:
Quote:
Hi all,

I want to interface my PIC uC with external ADC, I want to know which
is more easy and better a serial ADC or a parallel ADC?

Slower ADCs use the serial interface while faster
ones are connected in parallel.

Rene
--
Ing.Buero R.Tschaggelar - http://www.ibrtses.com
& commercial newsgroups - http://www.talkto.net

Back to top
Luhan Monat
Guest





Posted: Thu Mar 24, 2005 7:10 pm    Post subject: Re: Serial or Parallel ADC? Reply with quote

Jack// ani wrote:
Quote:
Hi all,

I want to interface my PIC uC with external ADC, I want to know which
is more easy and better a serial ADC or a parallel ADC?

Thanks


Its usually better to use a PIC with the ADC built in.

--
Luhan Monat (luhanis 'at' yahoo 'dot' com)
"The future is not what it used to be..."
http://members.cox.net/berniekm
Back to top
Rene Tschaggelar
Guest





Posted: Thu Mar 24, 2005 10:10 pm    Post subject: Re: Serial or Parallel ADC? Reply with quote

Luhan Monat wrote:

Quote:
Jack// ani wrote:

Hi all,

I want to interface my PIC uC with external ADC, I want to know which
is more easy and better a serial ADC or a parallel ADC?

Thanks


Its usually better to use a PIC with the ADC built in.

Provided the internal ADC is up to the required
specifications. Though not that bad, it is limited.

Rene
--
Ing.Buero R.Tschaggelar - http://www.ibrtses.com
& commercial newsgroups - http://www.talkto.net
Back to top
hamilton
Guest





Posted: Fri Mar 25, 2005 4:10 am    Post subject: Re: Serial or Parallel ADC? Reply with quote

You better check your ADCs, serial, SPI type are faster that parallel
types. Those used in DSP applications are all serial(SPI) type.



Rene Tschaggelar wrote:

Quote:
Jack// ani wrote:

Hi all,

I want to interface my PIC uC with external ADC, I want to know which
is more easy and better a serial ADC or a parallel ADC?


Slower ADCs use the serial interface while faster
ones are connected in parallel.

Rene
Back to top
Mac
Guest





Posted: Fri Mar 25, 2005 7:10 am    Post subject: Re: Serial or Parallel ADC? Reply with quote

On Thu, 24 Mar 2005 18:39:19 -0700, hamilton wrote:
[top posting fixed]
Quote:
Rene Tschaggelar wrote:

Jack// ani wrote:

Hi all,

I want to interface my PIC uC with external ADC, I want to know which
is more easy and better a serial ADC or a parallel ADC?


Slower ADCs use the serial interface while faster ones are connected in
parallel.

Rene

You better check your ADCs, serial, SPI type are faster that parallel
types. Those used in DSP applications are all serial(SPI) type.

If SPI can keep up with the ADC output, then the ADC is not fast, in my
book.

I don't know what problem domain you are used to working in, but all the
fast ADC's I am familiar with are parallel. It wouldn't be all that
practical, in my opinion, to do a 14-bit 100 MHz ADC as a serial part, and
of course it would be impossible for SPI.

--Mac
Back to top
Wouter van Ooijen (www.vo
Guest





Posted: Fri Mar 25, 2005 1:10 pm    Post subject: Re: Serial or Parallel ADC? Reply with quote

Quote:
I want to interface my PIC uC with external ADC, I want to know which
is more easy and better a serial ADC or a parallel ADC?

If one were better than the other on all aspects only one type would
be sold.

Note that there are aslo lots of serial variations (SPI, ICC, I2C,
1-wire, etc)


Wouter van Ooijen

-- ------------------------------------
http://www.voti.nl
Webshop for PICs and other electronics
http://www.voti.nl/hvu
Teacher electronics and informatics
Back to top
Chopper
Guest





Posted: Sun Mar 27, 2005 4:10 am    Post subject: Re: Serial or Parallel ADC? Reply with quote

Hi

I have used a 11 I/P 8 bit serial ADC on a PIC 16F84 quite successfully.
Serial uses less uC pins so you can the PIC for other things. I had mine
driving a LCD & RS232 chip as well. The programming is slightly more
difficult though as you have to program & count address pulses, clock pulses
& read out the serial data. Parallel stuff works in bytes (or nybbles) which
are usually easier to program

Hope this helps & not too late,

Chopper

Remove 'Chopper' from email address

"Jack// ani" <nospam4u_jack@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1111688607.582963.51980@l41g2000cwc.googlegroups.com...
Quote:
Hi all,

I want to interface my PIC uC with external ADC, I want to know which
is more easy and better a serial ADC or a parallel ADC?

Thanks
Back to top
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Electronics Forum Index -> Basics All times are GMT
Page 1 of 1

 
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum



Home & Living New Topics
Contact Us
Powered by phpBB