| Author |
Message |
Jack// ani
Guest
|
Posted:
Thu Mar 24, 2005 7:10 pm Post subject:
Serial or Parallel ADC? |
|
|
Hi all,
I want to interface my PIC uC with external ADC, I want to know which
is more easy and better a serial ADC or a parallel ADC?
Thanks
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Lord Garth
Guest
|
Posted:
Thu Mar 24, 2005 7:10 pm Post subject:
Re: Serial or Parallel ADC? |
|
|
"Jack// ani" <nospam4u_jack@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1111688607.582963.51980@l41g2000cwc.googlegroups.com...
| Quote: | Hi all,
I want to interface my PIC uC with external ADC, I want to know which
is more easy and better a serial ADC or a parallel ADC?
Thanks
|
If the uC has a serial port, that would be easier but the rate at which you
could read the conversion results will be faster with a parallel ADC. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Rene Tschaggelar
Guest
|
Posted:
Thu Mar 24, 2005 7:10 pm Post subject:
Re: Serial or Parallel ADC? |
|
|
Jack// ani wrote:
| Quote: | Hi all,
I want to interface my PIC uC with external ADC, I want to know which
is more easy and better a serial ADC or a parallel ADC?
|
Slower ADCs use the serial interface while faster
ones are connected in parallel.
Rene
--
Ing.Buero R.Tschaggelar - http://www.ibrtses.com
& commercial newsgroups - http://www.talkto.net
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Luhan Monat
Guest
|
Posted:
Thu Mar 24, 2005 7:10 pm Post subject:
Re: Serial or Parallel ADC? |
|
|
Jack// ani wrote:
| Quote: | Hi all,
I want to interface my PIC uC with external ADC, I want to know which
is more easy and better a serial ADC or a parallel ADC?
Thanks
|
Its usually better to use a PIC with the ADC built in.
--
Luhan Monat (luhanis 'at' yahoo 'dot' com)
"The future is not what it used to be..."
http://members.cox.net/berniekm |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Rene Tschaggelar
Guest
|
Posted:
Thu Mar 24, 2005 10:10 pm Post subject:
Re: Serial or Parallel ADC? |
|
|
Luhan Monat wrote:
| Quote: | Jack// ani wrote:
Hi all,
I want to interface my PIC uC with external ADC, I want to know which
is more easy and better a serial ADC or a parallel ADC?
Thanks
Its usually better to use a PIC with the ADC built in.
|
Provided the internal ADC is up to the required
specifications. Though not that bad, it is limited.
Rene
--
Ing.Buero R.Tschaggelar - http://www.ibrtses.com
& commercial newsgroups - http://www.talkto.net |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
hamilton
Guest
|
Posted:
Fri Mar 25, 2005 4:10 am Post subject:
Re: Serial or Parallel ADC? |
|
|
You better check your ADCs, serial, SPI type are faster that parallel
types. Those used in DSP applications are all serial(SPI) type.
Rene Tschaggelar wrote:
| Quote: | Jack// ani wrote:
Hi all,
I want to interface my PIC uC with external ADC, I want to know which
is more easy and better a serial ADC or a parallel ADC?
Slower ADCs use the serial interface while faster
ones are connected in parallel.
Rene |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Mac
Guest
|
Posted:
Fri Mar 25, 2005 7:10 am Post subject:
Re: Serial or Parallel ADC? |
|
|
On Thu, 24 Mar 2005 18:39:19 -0700, hamilton wrote:
[top posting fixed]
| Quote: | Rene Tschaggelar wrote:
Jack// ani wrote:
Hi all,
I want to interface my PIC uC with external ADC, I want to know which
is more easy and better a serial ADC or a parallel ADC?
Slower ADCs use the serial interface while faster ones are connected in
parallel.
Rene
You better check your ADCs, serial, SPI type are faster that parallel
types. Those used in DSP applications are all serial(SPI) type.
|
If SPI can keep up with the ADC output, then the ADC is not fast, in my
book.
I don't know what problem domain you are used to working in, but all the
fast ADC's I am familiar with are parallel. It wouldn't be all that
practical, in my opinion, to do a 14-bit 100 MHz ADC as a serial part, and
of course it would be impossible for SPI.
--Mac |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Wouter van Ooijen (www.vo
Guest
|
Posted:
Fri Mar 25, 2005 1:10 pm Post subject:
Re: Serial or Parallel ADC? |
|
|
| Quote: | I want to interface my PIC uC with external ADC, I want to know which
is more easy and better a serial ADC or a parallel ADC?
|
If one were better than the other on all aspects only one type would
be sold.
Note that there are aslo lots of serial variations (SPI, ICC, I2C,
1-wire, etc)
Wouter van Ooijen
-- ------------------------------------
http://www.voti.nl
Webshop for PICs and other electronics
http://www.voti.nl/hvu
Teacher electronics and informatics |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Chopper
Guest
|
Posted:
Sun Mar 27, 2005 4:10 am Post subject:
Re: Serial or Parallel ADC? |
|
|
Hi
I have used a 11 I/P 8 bit serial ADC on a PIC 16F84 quite successfully.
Serial uses less uC pins so you can the PIC for other things. I had mine
driving a LCD & RS232 chip as well. The programming is slightly more
difficult though as you have to program & count address pulses, clock pulses
& read out the serial data. Parallel stuff works in bytes (or nybbles) which
are usually easier to program
Hope this helps & not too late,
Chopper
Remove 'Chopper' from email address
"Jack// ani" <nospam4u_jack@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1111688607.582963.51980@l41g2000cwc.googlegroups.com...
| Quote: | Hi all,
I want to interface my PIC uC with external ADC, I want to know which
is more easy and better a serial ADC or a parallel ADC?
Thanks
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
|
|