Seek resistance table for main flex
Electronics Forum Index Electronics
Circuits, theory, electrons and discussions.
 
 FAQFAQ   MemberlistMemberlist     RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 
 
Google
 
Web ElectronicsHelp.net
Seek resistance table for main flex
Goto page 1, 2  Next
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Electronics Forum Index -> Components
Author Message
JS
Guest





Posted: Wed Dec 07, 2005 5:35 pm    Post subject: Seek resistance table for main flex Reply with quote

Google has not been my friend lately. Seems simple but I can't
locate some electrical data.

Where on Google can I find a simple table showing the typical
resistence per metre of mains flex with copper conductors and
different cross-sectional areas (0.5 mm^2, 0.75 mm^2, etc)?
Measured at room temperature. Would *tinned* copper conductors
make a a noticeable difference to the resistivity?

I am in ther UK. If I measure the resistence of 10 metres of
mains flex with my DC ohm-meter then will my resistence reading be
noticeably different to the resistence when I actually make use of
the 10 metre flex to light a 500W floodlight powered from the AC
mains at 230 volts/50 Hz?

Thank you.


--



Hope the cross-posting is seen as being made to relevant groups.
Don't flame me! :-)

Back to top
Dave Plowman (News)
Guest





Posted: Wed Dec 07, 2005 5:35 pm    Post subject: Re: Seek resistance table for main flex Reply with quote

In article <97258FCBAB8AB17E53A@66.250.146.159>,
JS <j_simmonmds@nomailthankyou.com> wrote:
Quote:
I am in ther UK. If I measure the resistence of 10 metres of
mains flex with my DC ohm-meter then will my resistence reading be
noticeably different to the resistence when I actually make use of
the 10 metre flex to light a 500W floodlight powered from the AC
mains at 230 volts/50 Hz?

You might find this more useful in practice.

http://www.tlc-direct.co.uk/Technical/Charts/VoltageDrop.html

--
*Time is what keeps everything from happening at once.

Dave Plowman dave@davenoise.co.uk London SW
To e-mail, change noise into sound.
Back to top
Victor Roberts
Guest





Posted: Wed Dec 07, 2005 5:35 pm    Post subject: Re: Seek resistance table for main flex Reply with quote

On Wed, 07 Dec 2005 14:08:08 GMT, JS
<j_simmonmds@nomailthankyou.com> wrote:

Quote:
Google has not been my friend lately. Seems simple but I can't
locate some electrical data.

Where on Google can I find a simple table showing the typical
resistence per metre of mains flex with copper conductors and
different cross-sectional areas (0.5 mm^2, 0.75 mm^2, etc)?

There should be hundreds of tables of copper wire resistance
on the web. You can download a very nice and FREE calculator
at www.wiretron.com. Get their Wire Info Software.

Quote:
Measured at room temperature. Would *tinned* copper conductors
make a a noticeable difference to the resistivity?

No.

Quote:
I am in ther UK.

The resistivety of copper is the same in countries :-) It
may be one of the few things that have not been changed by
our various governments.

Quote:
If I measure the resistence of 10 metres of
mains flex with my DC ohm-meter then will my resistence reading be
noticeably different to the resistence when I actually make use of
the 10 metre flex to light a 500W floodlight powered from the AC
mains at 230 volts/50 Hz?

If the wire does not get very warm, the answer is no. At
frequencies considerably higher than 50 Hz the "skin effect"
will set in and the resistance will go up.

Quote:
Thank you.

--
Vic Roberts
http://www.RobertsResearchInc.com
To reply via e-mail:
replace xxx with vdr in the Reply to: address
or use e-mail address listed at the Web site.

This information is provided for educational purposes only.
It may not be used in any publication or posted on any Web
site without written permission.

Back to top
David Lee
Guest





Posted: Wed Dec 07, 2005 5:35 pm    Post subject: Re: Seek resistance table for main flex Reply with quote

Victor Roberts wrote...
Quote:
If I measure the resistence of 10 metres of
mains flex with my DC ohm-meter then will my resistence reading be
noticeably different to the resistence when I actually make use of
the 10 metre flex to light a 500W floodlight powered from the AC
mains at 230 volts/50 Hz?

If the wire does not get very warm, the answer is no. At
frequencies considerably higher than 50 Hz the "skin effect"
will set in and the resistance will go up.

But you must never use the cable whilst tightly coiled up (unless you have
deliberately overspecified its capacity). A coiled cable has a much higher
AC impedance due to induction and can overheat alarmingly. I have seen a
coiled 13A extension cable melt with a 3kW load! Typically a 9m extension
rated 13A unwound is derated to only 8A when fully wound.

David
Back to top
Victor Roberts
Guest





Posted: Thu Dec 08, 2005 12:24 am    Post subject: Re: Seek resistance table for main flex Reply with quote

On Wed, 7 Dec 2005 17:02:52 -0000, "David Lee"
<davidlee_malvern@dont.use.this.bit.hotmail.com> wrote:

Quote:
Victor Roberts wrote...
If I measure the resistence of 10 metres of
mains flex with my DC ohm-meter then will my resistence reading be
noticeably different to the resistence when I actually make use of
the 10 metre flex to light a 500W floodlight powered from the AC
mains at 230 volts/50 Hz?

If the wire does not get very warm, the answer is no. At
frequencies considerably higher than 50 Hz the "skin effect"
will set in and the resistance will go up.

But you must never use the cable whilst tightly coiled up (unless you have
deliberately overspecified its capacity). A coiled cable has a much higher
AC impedance due to induction and can overheat alarmingly.

I have seen a
coiled 13A extension cable melt with a 3kW load! Typically a 9m extension
rated 13A unwound is derated to only 8A when fully wound.

A coiled cable does not have enough inductance to matter at
50 Hz. In addition, inductance does not generate heat, only
resistive loss can do that. High frequency coils will have
higher skin effect losses than straight wires operated at
the same high frequency, and this can generate extra heat
since the skin effect will decrease the effective area of a
conductor and therefore increase its resistance. However,
there is little to no skin effect at 50 Hz.

Coiled cords get hotter than equivalent straight cords
simply because the heat generated by the resistive losses
cannot escape as easily.

--
Vic Roberts
http://www.RobertsResearchInc.com
To reply via e-mail:
replace xxx with vdr in the Reply to: address
or use e-mail address listed at the Web site.

This information is provided for educational purposes only.
It may not be used in any publication or posted on any Web
site without written permission.
Back to top
JS
Guest





Posted: Thu Dec 08, 2005 8:22 am    Post subject: Re: Seek resistance table for main flex Reply with quote

On Wed 07 Dec 2005 18:24:48, Victor Roberts
<xxx@lighting-research.com> wrote:

Quote:
But you must never use the cable whilst tightly coiled up
(unless you have deliberately overspecified its capacity). A
coiled cable has a much higher AC impedance due to induction and
can overheat alarmingly.

I have seen a
coiled 13A extension cable melt with a 3kW load! Typically a 9m
extension rated 13A unwound is derated to only 8A when fully
wound.

A coiled cable does not have enough inductance to matter at
50 Hz. In addition, inductance does not generate heat, only
resistive loss can do that. High frequency coils will have
higher skin effect losses than straight wires operated at
the same high frequency, and this can generate extra heat
since the skin effect will decrease the effective area of a
conductor and therefore increase its resistance. However,
there is little to no skin effect at 50 Hz.

Coiled cords get hotter than equivalent straight cords
simply because the heat generated by the resistive losses
cannot escape as easily.

I have often wondered about how much of an effect my very neat
coils of mains flexes for my PC was having! And I really do seem
to have a lot of devices which plug into the mains.

What about the magentic or ERF effects of a tightly coiled main
flex? Say, 12 neat-ish turns with a diameter of 5 or 6 inches
..... How much of a nuisance might such a thing be to electronic
equipment like my PC?
Back to top
Paul Hovnanian P.E.
Guest





Posted: Thu Dec 08, 2005 9:35 am    Post subject: Re: Seek resistance table for main flex Reply with quote

JS wrote:
Quote:

[snip]


Quote:
I have often wondered about how much of an effect my very neat
coils of mains flexes for my PC was having! And I really do seem
to have a lot of devices which plug into the mains.

What about the magentic or ERF effects of a tightly coiled main
flex? Say, 12 neat-ish turns with a diameter of 5 or 6 inches
.... How much of a nuisance might such a thing be to electronic
equipment like my PC?

Not that much. Most of the flux linkages caused by the load current in
one conductor will be canceled by the current returning in the adjacent
conductor in the same cable assembly. There will be a small coupling
between separate turns of the cable, but nothing like the effect you'd
get by constructing a single conductor coil of similar dimensions.

--
Paul Hovnanian mailto:Paul@Hovnanian.com
------------------------------------------------------------------
The large print giveth and the small print taketh away.
-- Tom Waits
Back to top
Franc Zabkar
Guest





Posted: Thu Dec 08, 2005 9:35 am    Post subject: Re: Seek resistance table for main flex Reply with quote

On Thu, 08 Dec 2005 02:22:25 GMT, JS <j_simmonmds@nomailthankyou.com>
put finger to keyboard and composed:

Quote:
On Wed 07 Dec 2005 18:24:48, Victor Roberts
xxx@lighting-research.com> wrote:

But you must never use the cable whilst tightly coiled up
(unless you have deliberately overspecified its capacity). A
coiled cable has a much higher AC impedance due to induction and
can overheat alarmingly.

I have seen a
coiled 13A extension cable melt with a 3kW load! Typically a 9m
extension rated 13A unwound is derated to only 8A when fully
wound.

A coiled cable does not have enough inductance to matter at
50 Hz. In addition, inductance does not generate heat, only
resistive loss can do that. High frequency coils will have
higher skin effect losses than straight wires operated at
the same high frequency, and this can generate extra heat
since the skin effect will decrease the effective area of a
conductor and therefore increase its resistance. However,
there is little to no skin effect at 50 Hz.

Coiled cords get hotter than equivalent straight cords
simply because the heat generated by the resistive losses
cannot escape as easily.

I have often wondered about how much of an effect my very neat
coils of mains flexes for my PC was having! And I really do seem
to have a lot of devices which plug into the mains.

What about the magentic or ERF effects of a tightly coiled main
flex? Say, 12 neat-ish turns with a diameter of 5 or 6 inches
.... How much of a nuisance might such a thing be to electronic
equipment like my PC?

The magnetic field produced by any number of turns of mains flex is
zero. Think about it.

-- Franc Zabkar

Please remove one 'i' from my address when replying by email.
Back to top
Dave Plowman (News)
Guest





Posted: Thu Dec 08, 2005 10:36 am    Post subject: Re: Seek resistance table for main flex Reply with quote

In article <9726182566AC17E53A@66.250.146.159>,
JS <j_simmonmds@nomailthankyou.com> wrote:
Quote:
Coiled cords get hotter than equivalent straight cords
simply because the heat generated by the resistive losses
cannot escape as easily.

I have often wondered about how much of an effect my very neat
coils of mains flexes for my PC was having! And I really do seem
to have a lot of devices which plug into the mains.

Nothing on a PC takes much current. The IEC leads used are all way over
specified for this use.

--
*The statement above is false

Dave Plowman dave@davenoise.co.uk London SW
To e-mail, change noise into sound.
Back to top
Victor Roberts
Guest





Posted: Thu Dec 08, 2005 5:35 pm    Post subject: Re: Seek resistance table for main flex Reply with quote

On Thu, 08 Dec 2005 02:22:25 GMT, JS
<j_simmonmds@nomailthankyou.com> wrote:

Quote:
On Wed 07 Dec 2005 18:24:48, Victor Roberts
xxx@lighting-research.com> wrote:

But you must never use the cable whilst tightly coiled up
(unless you have deliberately overspecified its capacity). A
coiled cable has a much higher AC impedance due to induction and
can overheat alarmingly.

I have seen a
coiled 13A extension cable melt with a 3kW load! Typically a 9m
extension rated 13A unwound is derated to only 8A when fully
wound.

A coiled cable does not have enough inductance to matter at
50 Hz. In addition, inductance does not generate heat, only
resistive loss can do that. High frequency coils will have
higher skin effect losses than straight wires operated at
the same high frequency, and this can generate extra heat
since the skin effect will decrease the effective area of a
conductor and therefore increase its resistance. However,
there is little to no skin effect at 50 Hz.

Coiled cords get hotter than equivalent straight cords
simply because the heat generated by the resistive losses
cannot escape as easily.

I have often wondered about how much of an effect my very neat
coils of mains flexes for my PC was having! And I really do seem
to have a lot of devices which plug into the mains.

What about the magentic or ERF effects of a tightly coiled main
flex? Say, 12 neat-ish turns with a diameter of 5 or 6 inches
.... How much of a nuisance might such a thing be to electronic
equipment like my PC?

As has been said, the net magnetic flux far from the coil is
zero since you have two identical currents flowing in
opposite directions. The local effects are also just about
zero since the frequency is only 50 Hz. If this were 50 MHz,
then there would be turn-to-turn coupling and additional
heating.

--
Vic Roberts
http://www.RobertsResearchInc.com
To reply via e-mail:
replace xxx with vdr in the Reply to: address
or use e-mail address listed at the Web site.

This information is provided for educational purposes only.
It may not be used in any publication or posted on any Web
site without written permission.
Back to top
JS
Guest





Posted: Thu Dec 08, 2005 5:35 pm    Post subject: Re: Seek resistance table for main flex Reply with quote

On Thu 08 Dec 2005 06:00:12, Franc Zabkar <fzabkar@iinternode.on.net>
wrote:

Quote:
The magnetic field produced by any number of turns of mains flex is
zero. Think about it.

Hmmm. Yes. :-)

I was hoping to use a compass deflection as a way of telling how much
heat/power was being lost in neatly wrapped coiled of mains flex.

Surely there is a loss of something due to the neatness - or perhaps
not?
Back to top
JS
Guest





Posted: Thu Dec 08, 2005 5:35 pm    Post subject: Re: Seek resistance table for main flex Reply with quote

Quote:
Table 4H3B gives the volt drop of the cable in mV/A/m. You
should allow for a maximum of 2% drop in voltage at the far end
of your flex.

I'm not sure *why* you would want to know the resistance per se,
but you can work out the resistance from these figures.

Hi Rumble

I was hoping to measure the resistence across the live/neutral pins
of the mains plug and then deduct the resistence of the main lead
(which is approx 10m of 1.0 mm^2).

From the result I was looking to know what the cold bulb resistence
is and from that infer the wattage.

The idea is to save opening up the housing and taking the bulb out to
measure the resistence.

Your table is useful and I have kept it but it does not directly
address my problem unless I do your calculations below each time.

Can I find a simple table which gives me resistence per metre of 1.0
mm^2 wire (or whatever cable I am using)?

Quote:

So, Assume your voltage is 240V A.C.
2% volt drop is 0.02 * 240 = 4.8V

The current through your halogen lamp is I=P/V = 500/240 = 2.08A
If you used 1mm sq flex, the volt drop would be 46mV/A/m

So the volt drop in this example would be 46mV * 2.08 * 10 =
0.95V which is well under 4.8V. :-)


--
Back to top
Victor Roberts
Guest





Posted: Fri Dec 09, 2005 1:28 am    Post subject: Re: Seek resistance table for main flex Reply with quote

On Thu, 08 Dec 2005 14:43:11 GMT, JS
<j_simmonmds@nomailthankyou.com> wrote:

Quote:
On Thu 08 Dec 2005 06:00:12, Franc Zabkar <fzabkar@iinternode.on.net
wrote:

The magnetic field produced by any number of turns of mains flex is
zero. Think about it.

Hmmm. Yes. :-)

I was hoping to use a compass deflection as a way of telling how much
heat/power was being lost in neatly wrapped coiled of mains flex.

Even if you had a net magnetic field, it would be an AC
field, and your compass would not respond to that. Also,
there is no direct correlation between the strength of the
magnetic field and the power loss. You need to include a
number of other factors.

Quote:
Surely there is a loss of something due to the neatness - or perhaps
not?

Why should neatness lead to loss? In the days before all
electronic devices used printed circuits, with systems were
connected with point-to-point wiring, high frequency
electronic systems had much neater wiring than low frequency
equipment, since it lead to shorter lengths of wire and
lower capacitance between wires.

--
Vic Roberts
http://www.RobertsResearchInc.com
To reply via e-mail:
replace xxx with vdr in the Reply to: address
or use e-mail address listed at the Web site.

This information is provided for educational purposes only.
It may not be used in any publication or posted on any Web
site without written permission.
Back to top
Victor Roberts
Guest





Posted: Fri Dec 09, 2005 1:31 am    Post subject: Re: Seek resistance table for main flex Reply with quote

On Thu, 08 Dec 2005 14:39:17 GMT, JS
<j_simmonmds@nomailthankyou.com> wrote:

Quote:
Table 4H3B gives the volt drop of the cable in mV/A/m. You
should allow for a maximum of 2% drop in voltage at the far end
of your flex.

I'm not sure *why* you would want to know the resistance per se,
but you can work out the resistance from these figures.

Hi Rumble

I was hoping to measure the resistence across the live/neutral pins
of the mains plug and then deduct the resistence of the main lead
(which is approx 10m of 1.0 mm^2).

From the result I was looking to know what the cold bulb resistence
is and from that infer the wattage.

The idea is to save opening up the housing and taking the bulb out to
measure the resistence.

Your table is useful and I have kept it but it does not directly
address my problem unless I do your calculations below each time.

Can I find a simple table which gives me resistence per metre of 1.0
mm^2 wire (or whatever cable I am using)?

See the answer I gave you yesterday. You can find a
resistance calculator for copper wire at www.wiretron.com

--
Vic Roberts
http://www.RobertsResearchInc.com
To reply via e-mail:
replace xxx with vdr in the Reply to: address
or use e-mail address listed at the Web site.

This information is provided for educational purposes only.
It may not be used in any publication or posted on any Web
site without written permission.
Back to top
Andy Wade
Guest





Posted: Fri Dec 09, 2005 1:35 am    Post subject: Re: Seek resistance table for main flex Reply with quote

JS wrote:

Quote:
Can I find a simple table which gives me resistence per metre of 1.0
mm^2 wire (or whatever cable I am using)?

The resistance per metre of a 1 mm^2 copper conductor is 18.1 milliohms
at 20 deg. C and the temperature coefficient is about +0.4% per degree.

--
Andy
Back to top
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Electronics Forum Index -> Components All times are GMT
Goto page 1, 2  Next
Page 1 of 2

 
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum



Home & Living New Topics
Powered by phpBB