| Author |
Message |
Henry Kiefer
Guest
|
 Posted:
Tue Nov 22, 2005 1:36 am Post subject:
"Standard parts" for rf amps? |
|
|
Hi all -
I'm not new to electronics but to vhf comm. I want to build small circuits:
LNA, power amp to 10 watts, etc. At the moment between 10MegHz and 150MegHz.
What are the standard parts, cheap but effective, preferable with spice
model availability (I'm doing much with LTspice)?
Transistors, ICs, coil-suppliers, suppliers in general for small quantities
Please no triodes etc. I like more SMD ;-)
Lists somewhere in the net? Japanese parts?
I think such lists will be of interest to others too!
Thank you!!
Best regards -
Henry
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Guest
|
| Posted:
Tue Nov 22, 2005 1:36 am Post subject:
Re: "Standard parts" for rf amps? |
|
|
No list needed!
VHF traditionally begins at around 6 meters, but design techniques
there are not much different from those used at 10 meters. The point
where you need to begin being more careful regarding circuit layout is
around 2 meters. Many devices that operate on the lower shortwave
bands still function reasonably well at this region. So... the same
analog circuits will work, but WATCH OUT for circuit layout.
The Eternal Squire |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Henry Kiefer
Guest
|
| Posted:
Tue Nov 22, 2005 1:36 am Post subject:
Re: "Standard parts" for rf amps? |
|
|
Yes Jim!
Im not very experienced there (Digital designs/layout is my profession) -
but for example I designed a LNA and got simulations results (even for noise
performance) very similar to a real circuit built from a ham with great
background (found later on the net).
Even a Synchronous Oscillator for 145MegHz seem to work with LTspice. I work
on it today trying to modify it to an fsk modulated power oscillator to keep
component count to the lowest.
Why you ask?
- Henry
"RST Engineering (jw)" <jim@rstengineering.com> schrieb im Newsbeitrag
news:11o4q89q7708kcd@corp.supernews.com...
| Quote: | You are going to use Spice to model an RF circuit. DId I get that right?
Jim
"Henry Kiefer" <otc_friend@gmx.net> wrote in message
news:438262c8$0$27904$9b4e6d93@newsread4.arcor-online.net...
Hi all -
I'm not new to electronics but to vhf comm. I want to build small
circuits:
LNA, power amp to 10 watts, etc. At the moment between 10MegHz and
150MegHz.
What are the standard parts, cheap but effective, preferable with spice
model availability (I'm doing much with LTspice)?
Transistors, ICs, coil-suppliers, suppliers in general for small
quantities
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
RST Engineering (jw)
Guest
|
| Posted:
Tue Nov 22, 2005 1:36 am Post subject:
Re: "Standard parts" for rf amps? |
|
|
You are going to use Spice to model an RF circuit. DId I get that right?
Jim
"Henry Kiefer" <otc_friend@gmx.net> wrote in message
news:438262c8$0$27904$9b4e6d93@newsread4.arcor-online.net...
| Quote: | Hi all -
I'm not new to electronics but to vhf comm. I want to build small
circuits:
LNA, power amp to 10 watts, etc. At the moment between 10MegHz and
150MegHz.
What are the standard parts, cheap but effective, preferable with spice
model availability (I'm doing much with LTspice)?
Transistors, ICs, coil-suppliers, suppliers in general for small
quantities |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Mark
Guest
|
| Posted:
Tue Nov 22, 2005 7:37 am Post subject:
Re: "Standard parts" for rf amps? |
|
|
there are lots of parts...
stat by looking at these vendors
Mini Circuits
Maxum
Mark |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
DaveM
Guest
|
| Posted:
Tue Nov 22, 2005 8:41 am Post subject:
Re: "Standard parts" for rf amps? |
|
|
"Henry Kiefer" <otc_friend@gmx.net> wrote in message
news:438262c8$0$27904$9b4e6d93@newsread4.arcor-online.net...
| Quote: | Hi all -
I'm not new to electronics but to vhf comm. I want to build small
circuits:
LNA, power amp to 10 watts, etc. At the moment between 10MegHz and
150MegHz.
What are the standard parts, cheap but effective, preferable with spice
model availability (I'm doing much with LTspice)?
Transistors, ICs, coil-suppliers, suppliers in general for small
quantities
Please no triodes etc. I like more SMD ;-)
Lists somewhere in the net? Japanese parts?
I think such lists will be of interest to others too!
Thank you!!
Best regards -
Henry
|
http://www.rfparts.com/ is a good source of RF components. Also look at
http://www.danssmallpartsandkits.net/ for great prices on common parts.
--
Dave M
MasonDG44 at comcast dot net (Just substitute the appropriate characters in
the address)
Never take a laxative and a sleeping pill at the same time!! |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
John Larkin
Guest
|
| Posted:
Tue Nov 22, 2005 9:35 am Post subject:
Re: "Standard parts" for rf amps? |
|
|
On Mon, 21 Nov 2005 16:40:40 -0800, "RST Engineering \(jw\)"
<jim@rstengineering.com> wrote:
| Quote: | You are going to use Spice to model an RF circuit. DId I get that right?
Jim
|
Why not?
John |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
RST Engineering
Guest
|
| Posted:
Tue Nov 22, 2005 9:35 am Post subject:
Re: "Standard parts" for rf amps? |
|
|
Well, just for starters, what does Spice say about a 1000 pf capacitor with
either ½" lead lengths or a total of 1" of PCB trace at 150 MHz.?
Jim
"John Larkin" <jjlarkin@highNOTlandTHIStechnologyPART.com> wrote in message
news:ms55o1d4h3rrlkp1l4igkfufa807krib8a@4ax.com...
| Quote: | On Mon, 21 Nov 2005 16:40:40 -0800, "RST Engineering \(jw\)"
jim@rstengineering.com> wrote:
You are going to use Spice to model an RF circuit. DId I get that right?
Jim
Why not?
John
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Henry Kiefer
Guest
|
| Posted:
Tue Nov 22, 2005 5:18 pm Post subject:
Re: "Standard parts" for rf amps? |
|
|
Ok Jim. You're asked about the stray components hidden in the real
parts/circuit. If you take the values from the datasheets for die and/or
package or give it a guess if not available, and add values for the pcb
lines, you have a good simulation result. The pcb by itself is not of much
interest if you simulate not much over 100MegHz. Even starting a oscillator
with thermal noise is possible!
Sure, you must know what you're doing :-)
Spice by itself can simulate almost all if you have the right models
included - even if you wanna simulate a mechanical system. There is no
frequency limit at least to 100GHz.
Do you had bad result doing Spice?
To come back to your question: Spice will give you better results than your
real circuit! You can connect a probe with no interaction to the circuit!
Try this with your real parts! Don't forget the component variations in real
circuits coming from the manufacturing processes of the parts.
- Henry
"RST Engineering" <jim@rstengineering.com> schrieb im Newsbeitrag
news:11o5jngnvqrqmcb@corp.supernews.com...
| Quote: | Well, just for starters, what does Spice say about a 1000 pf capacitor
with
either ½" lead lengths or a total of 1" of PCB trace at 150 MHz.?
Jim
"John Larkin" <jjlarkin@highNOTlandTHIStechnologyPART.com> wrote in
message
news:ms55o1d4h3rrlkp1l4igkfufa807krib8a@4ax.com...
On Mon, 21 Nov 2005 16:40:40 -0800, "RST Engineering \(jw\)"
jim@rstengineering.com> wrote:
You are going to use Spice to model an RF circuit. DId I get that
right?
Jim
Why not?
John
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Henry Kiefer
Guest
|
| Posted:
Tue Nov 22, 2005 5:20 pm Post subject:
Re: "Standard parts" for rf amps? |
|
|
Thank Mark!
MC and Maxim is not new to me. I thought on list of cheap, easy getting
parts with reasonable performance.
- Henry
"Mark" <makolber@yahoo.com> schrieb im Newsbeitrag
news:1132623435.194584.293170@z14g2000cwz.googlegroups.com...
| Quote: | there are lots of parts...
stat by looking at these vendors
Mini Circuits
Maxum
Mark
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
RST Engineering
Guest
|
| Posted:
Wed Nov 23, 2005 12:05 am Post subject:
Re: "Standard parts" for rf amps? |
|
|
"Henry Kiefer" <otc_friend@gmx.net> wrote in message
news:4382ffe2$0$27884$9b4e6d93@newsread4.arcor-online.net...
| Quote: | Ok Jim. You're asked about the stray components hidden in the real
parts/circuit.
|
There is nothing hidden at all. Strays are a part of the real life at VHF
and above. Sometimes strays have more effect than the part itself.
If you take the values from the datasheets for die and/or
| Quote: | package or give it a guess if not available, and add values for the pcb
lines, you have a good simulation result.
|
Horsefeathers. What "values" do you add for the pcb lines?
The pcb by itself is not of much
| Quote: | interest if you simulate not much over 100MegHz. Even starting a
oscillator
with thermal noise is possible!
Sure, you must know what you're doing :-)
|
As with anything in the world.
| Quote: |
Spice by itself can simulate almost all if you have the right models
included - even if you wanna simulate a mechanical system. There is no
frequency limit at least to 100GHz.
|
The problem is getting the right models, which is an art in and of itself.
| Quote: |
Do you had bad result doing Spice?
To come back to your question: Spice will give you better results than
your
real circuit! You can connect a probe with no interaction to the circuit!
Try this with your real parts! Don't forget the component variations in
real
circuits coming from the manufacturing processes of the parts.
|
Again I ask the question: What does Spice say about a 1000 pf capacitor
with 1" total lead length at 150 MHz.? Don't give me the BS about Spice
being "better than a real circuit". Until you can give me a ferrite slug on
one end of a toothpick and a brass slug on the other end to increase or
decrease inductance in Spice, the physical circuit is the "real" circuit.
Jim |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Chris Jones
Guest
|
| Posted:
Wed Nov 23, 2005 1:35 am Post subject:
Re: "Standard parts" for rf amps? |
|
|
RST Engineering wrote:
| Quote: |
"Henry Kiefer" <otc_friend@gmx.net> wrote in message
news:4382ffe2$0$27884$9b4e6d93@newsread4.arcor-online.net...
Ok Jim. You're asked about the stray components hidden in the real
parts/circuit.
There is nothing hidden at all. Strays are a part of the real life at VHF
and above. Sometimes strays have more effect than the part itself.
You have to put the strays into the spice model if you want an accurate |
result, just like you would have to if you work it out with a pencil and
paper.
| Quote: | If you take the values from the datasheets for die and/or
package or give it a guess if not available, and add values for the pcb
lines, you have a good simulation result.
Horsefeathers. What "values" do you add for the pcb lines?
|
You can work out the inductance, resistance (including skin effect) and
capacitance of arbitrary structures using the free programs FastCap and
FastHenry, though these consider inductive and capacitive effects
separately so you have to break the problem into several parts sometimes,
e.g. if the structure is a significant fraction of a wavelength in size.
Constructing the model files can be tedious, and you may end up having to
write some code to automate it. You can view the model files using a
viewer program which used to be and hopefully still is available from
www.fastfieldsolvers.com You could also buy one of the commercial
full-wave solvers if you have more spare money than time.
| Quote: | The pcb by itself is not of much
interest if you simulate not much over 100MegHz. Even starting a
oscillator
with thermal noise is possible!
Sure, you must know what you're doing :-)
As with anything in the world.
Spice by itself can simulate almost all if you have the right models
included - even if you wanna simulate a mechanical system. There is no
frequency limit at least to 100GHz.
The problem is getting the right models, which is an art in and of itself.
Right but you have to do that one way or another anyway even if the model is |
inside your head, unless you design purely by trial and error.
| Quote: | Do you had bad result doing Spice?
To come back to your question: Spice will give you better results than
your
real circuit! You can connect a probe with no interaction to the circuit!
Try this with your real parts! Don't forget the component variations in
real
circuits coming from the manufacturing processes of the parts.
Again I ask the question: What does Spice say about a 1000 pf capacitor
with 1" total lead length at 150 MHz.? Don't give me the BS about Spice
being "better than a real circuit". Until you can give me a ferrite slug
on one end of a toothpick and a brass slug on the other end to increase or
decrease inductance in Spice, the physical circuit is the "real" circuit.
Jim
The real advantage of spice is in situations where trial and error is more |
expensive than getting it right the first time (where you can justify
spending a long time making good models). He does also have a point about
being able to probe components inside a circuit that you could never probe
on a real one due to loading effects of the real probe. It seems to me
that your real objection is not with computer simulation of circuits, but
rather with poor models for components. Fair enough, garbage in garbage
out, but I would consider using bad models to be a form of 'user error'.
Chris |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Ken Smith
Guest
|
| Posted:
Wed Nov 23, 2005 1:36 am Post subject:
Re: "Standard parts" for rf amps? |
|
|
In article <11o6neic2a7gt64@corp.supernews.com>,
RST Engineering <jim@rstengineering.com> wrote:
| Quote: |
"Henry Kiefer" <otc_friend@gmx.net> wrote in message
news:4382ffe2$0$27884$9b4e6d93@newsread4.arcor-online.net...
Ok Jim. You're asked about the stray components hidden in the real
parts/circuit.
There is nothing hidden at all. Strays are a part of the real life at VHF
and above. Sometimes strays have more effect than the part itself.
|
Heck, that can happen before you hit 1MHz. Check out the ESL and ESR of a
47,000uF capacitor some time.
--
--
kensmith@rahul.net forging knowledge |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Roy Lewallen
Guest
|
| Posted:
Wed Nov 23, 2005 7:52 am Post subject:
Re: "Standard parts" for rf amps? |
|
|
Ken Smith wrote:
| Quote: |
Heck, that can happen before you hit 1MHz. Check out the ESL and ESR of a
47,000uF capacitor some time.
|
How about dielectric absorption ("soak")? I first encountered this in an
electrolytic capacitor being used for generating a sweep of about a
minute duration. The capacitor had to be kept shorted for several
seconds between sweeps in order for the charge to adequately empty, an
equivalent frequency of less than one Hz.
Roy Lewallen, W7EL |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Joel Kolstad
Guest
|
| Posted:
Wed Nov 23, 2005 7:53 am Post subject:
Re: "Standard parts" for rf amps? |
|
|
"Ken Smith" <kensmith@green.rahul.net> wrote in message
news:dm0h2k$8hi$4@blue.rahul.net...
| Quote: | Heck, that can happen before you hit 1MHz. Check out the ESL and ESR of a
47,000uF capacitor some time.
|
For some of the university work I've done, some of our reference papers are
from people modeling power lines as full-fledged transmission lines that are
many wavelengths long at 50Hz. No simple equivalent circuit model works for
them either! |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
|
|
FAQ
Memberlist
Register
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in