| Author |
Message |
Andre Majorel
Guest
|
Posted:
Fri Sep 16, 2005 9:14 am Post subject:
LM336 vs. LM336B ? |
|
|
What is the difference between the LM336 and LM336B ? I can't
find any on the data sheet I have doesn't show any and yet
Farnell carries both (at very different prices).
Thanks in advance.
--
André Majorel <URL:http://www.teaser.fr/~amajorel/>
(Counterfeit: osehiq@compression.com ipuzup@vigilant.com)
"La presse doit diffuser des idées saines." -- Serge Dassault,
propriétaire de la Socpresse.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Roger Hamlett
Guest
|
Posted:
Fri Sep 16, 2005 3:10 pm Post subject:
Re: LM336 vs. LM336B ? |
|
|
"Andre Majorel" <cheney@halliburton.com> wrote in message
news:slrndil386.s25.cheney@atc5.vermine.org...
| Quote: | What is the difference between the LM336 and LM336B ? I can't
find any on the data sheet I have doesn't show any and yet
Farnell carries both (at very different prices).
Thanks in advance.
The standard National data sheet, has two columns in the electrical |
characteristics section, one labelled 'LM136A/LM336A', and the other
'LM336B'.
The B has slightly worse tolerance on the initial reference voltage, but
about twice as good temperature stability.
Best Wishes |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Guest
|
Posted:
Sat Sep 17, 2005 11:37 pm Post subject:
Re: LM336 vs. LM336B ? |
|
|
Roger Hamlett schrieb:
| Quote: | "Andre Majorel" <cheney@halliburton.com> wrote in message
news:slrndil386.s25.cheney@atc5.vermine.org...
What is the difference between the LM336 and LM336B ? I can't
find any on the data sheet I have doesn't show any and yet
Farnell carries both (at very different prices).
Thanks in advance.
The standard National data sheet, has two columns in the electrical
characteristics section, one labelled 'LM136A/LM336A', and the other
'LM336B'.
|
This should probably read LM136A/LM236A. The LM136 has an operating
temperature range from -55°C to +150°C, the LM236 from -25°C to
+85°C.
| Quote: | The B has slightly worse tolerance on the initial reference voltage, but
about twice as good temperature stability.
Best Wishes
|
The LM336 is specified at (2.49 +/- 0.10)V at 25°C, and the LM336B at
(2.49 +/- 0.05)V, which is twice as good. Between the two, there is no
difference in temperature stability. The stability of the LM136 and the
LM236 is worse because it refers to a larger temperature range.
Martin.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Roger Hamlett
Guest
|
Posted:
Sun Sep 18, 2005 12:35 am Post subject:
Re: LM336 vs. LM336B ? |
|
|
<clicliclic@freenet.de> wrote in message
news:1126982269.683068.214760@g43g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
Roger Hamlett schrieb:
| Quote: | "Andre Majorel" <cheney@halliburton.com> wrote in message
news:slrndil386.s25.cheney@atc5.vermine.org...
What is the difference between the LM336 and LM336B ? I can't
find any on the data sheet I have doesn't show any and yet
Farnell carries both (at very different prices).
Thanks in advance.
The standard National data sheet, has two columns in the electrical
characteristics section, one labelled 'LM136A/LM336A', and the other
'LM336B'.
This should probably read LM136A/LM236A. The LM136 has an operating
temperature range from -55°C to +150°C, the LM236 from -25°C to
+85°C.
No. There is a seperate column for the 136/236. |
| Quote: | The B has slightly worse tolerance on the initial reference voltage,
but
about twice as good temperature stability.
Best Wishes
The LM336 is specified at (2.49 +/- 0.10)V at 25°C, and the LM336B at
(2.49 +/- 0.05)V, which is twice as good. Between the two, there is no
difference in temperature stability. The stability of the LM136 and the
LM236 is worse because it refers to a larger temperature range.
Martin.
Sorry, but this differs completely from the sheet. The 136/236, has it's |
own seperate column. I can only say what is printed on the sheets I
have...
Best Wishes |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Guest
|
Posted:
Sun Sep 18, 2005 12:35 am Post subject:
Re: LM336 vs. LM336B ? |
|
|
Roger Hamlett schrieb:
| Quote: | clicliclic@freenet.de> wrote in message
news:1126982269.683068.214760@g43g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
Roger Hamlett schrieb:
"Andre Majorel" <cheney@halliburton.com> wrote in message
news:slrndil386.s25.cheney@atc5.vermine.org...
What is the difference between the LM336 and LM336B ? I can't
find any on the data sheet I have doesn't show any and yet
Farnell carries both (at very different prices).
Thanks in advance.
The standard National data sheet, has two columns in the electrical
characteristics section, one labelled 'LM136A/LM336A', and the other
'LM336B'.
This should probably read LM136A/LM236A. The LM136 has an operating
temperature range from -55°C to +150°C, the LM236 from -25°C to
+85°C.
No. There is a seperate column for the 136/236.
The B has slightly worse tolerance on the initial reference voltage,
but
about twice as good temperature stability.
Best Wishes
The LM336 is specified at (2.49 +/- 0.10)V at 25°C, and the LM336B at
(2.49 +/- 0.05)V, which is twice as good. Between the two, there is no
difference in temperature stability. The stability of the LM136 and the
LM236 is worse because it refers to a larger temperature range.
Martin.
Sorry, but this differs completely from the sheet. The 136/236, has it's
own seperate column. I can only say what is printed on the sheets I
have...
Best Wishes
|
I think there is little real disagreement. Unfortunately the original
poster didn't tell us if he meant the 2.5V versions or the 5V versions
of this chip. Unfortunately you mentioned only the LM336A and LM336B,
but not the LM336 (no A or B suffix) he also asked about. My point was
to explain the seemingly strange fact that the higher grade
LM236/LM236A
and LM136/LM136A have worse temperature stability specs.
My reference is the National Semiconductor pdf datasheet dated May
1998.
This has just two columns: one labelled "LM136A-2.5/ LM236A-2.5/
LM136-2.5/ LM236-2.5" and the other "LM336B-2.5/ LM336-2.5".
Martin. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Cyrus
Guest
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Cyrus
Guest
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Roger Hamlett
Guest
|
Posted:
Sun Sep 18, 2005 8:35 am Post subject:
Re: LM336 vs. LM336B ? |
|
|
<clicliclic@freenet.de> wrote in message
news:1126993443.786829.227190@g43g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
Roger Hamlett schrieb:
| Quote: | clicliclic@freenet.de> wrote in message
news:1126982269.683068.214760@g43g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
Roger Hamlett schrieb:
"Andre Majorel" <cheney@halliburton.com> wrote in message
news:slrndil386.s25.cheney@atc5.vermine.org...
What is the difference between the LM336 and LM336B ? I can't
find any on the data sheet I have doesn't show any and yet
Farnell carries both (at very different prices).
Thanks in advance.
The standard National data sheet, has two columns in the electrical
characteristics section, one labelled 'LM136A/LM336A', and the other
'LM336B'.
This should probably read LM136A/LM236A. The LM136 has an operating
temperature range from -55°C to +150°C, the LM236 from -25°C to
+85°C.
No. There is a seperate column for the 136/236.
The B has slightly worse tolerance on the initial reference voltage,
but
about twice as good temperature stability.
Best Wishes
The LM336 is specified at (2.49 +/- 0.10)V at 25°C, and the LM336B at
(2.49 +/- 0.05)V, which is twice as good. Between the two, there is no
difference in temperature stability. The stability of the LM136 and
the
LM236 is worse because it refers to a larger temperature range.
Martin.
Sorry, but this differs completely from the sheet. The 136/236, has it's
own seperate column. I can only say what is printed on the sheets I
have...
Best Wishes
I think there is little real disagreement. Unfortunately the original
poster didn't tell us if he meant the 2.5V versions or the 5V versions
of this chip. Unfortunately you mentioned only the LM336A and LM336B,
but not the LM336 (no A or B suffix) he also asked about. My point was
to explain the seemingly strange fact that the higher grade
LM236/LM236A
and LM136/LM136A have worse temperature stability specs.
OK. |
| Quote: | My reference is the National Semiconductor pdf datasheet dated May
1998.
This has just two columns: one labelled "LM136A-2.5/ LM236A-2.5/
LM136-2.5/ LM236-2.5" and the other "LM336B-2.5/ LM336-2.5".
Mine was the 2004, printed databook. They look to have 'fiddled' a bit |
with their layout and claims.
The usual explanation for a less stable version being more expensive, is
that they basically don't sell an of them!... :-)
Best Wishes |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
|
|