| Author |
Message |
Nigel Walker
Guest
|
Posted:
Thu Sep 08, 2005 8:35 am Post subject:
Difference between 63B09P and 63B09RP? |
|
|
Could someone tell me the difference between the 63B09P and 63B09RP Hitachi
microprocessor chips or point me to a source of data?
Thanks.
--
Nigel.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Wolfgang Mahringer
Guest
|
Posted:
Thu Sep 08, 2005 2:52 pm Post subject:
Re: Difference between 63B09P and 63B09RP? |
|
|
Hi Nigel,
Nigel Walker wrote:
| Quote: | Could someone tell me the difference between the 63B09P and 63B09RP Hitachi
microprocessor chips or point me to a source of data?
|
Hm. Never heard of the "R" type on 63x09/68x09 processors.
Maybe it is just a mirrored pinning ("reverse").
HTH
Wolfgang
--
From-address is Spam trap
Use: wolfgang (dot) mahringer (at) sbg (dot) at |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Nigel Walker
Guest
|
Posted:
Tue Sep 13, 2005 4:03 pm Post subject:
Re: Difference between 63B09P and 63B09RP? |
|
|
"Wolfgang Mahringer" <yeti201@gmx.at> wrote in message
news:OeTTe.8$F73.580679@news.salzburg-online.at...
| Quote: | Hi Nigel,
Nigel Walker wrote:
Could someone tell me the difference between the 63B09P and 63B09RP
Hitachi microprocessor chips or point me to a source of data?
Hm. Never heard of the "R" type on 63x09/68x09 processors.
Maybe it is just a mirrored pinning ("reverse").
HTH
Wolfgang
|
Thanks for the reply, Wolfang. I still haven't managed to find data. I have
several tubes of these things and they don't work on my 63B09P board. I'm
sure the required data must be somewhere on the web!
--
Regards,
Nigel.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Roger Hamlett
Guest
|
Posted:
Tue Sep 13, 2005 4:38 pm Post subject:
Re: Difference between 63B09P and 63B09RP? |
|
|
"Nigel Walker" <nawalker@softhome.net> wrote in message
news:Yb2dnUVyIPVwLLveRVnyrw@eclipse.net.uk...
| Quote: |
"Wolfgang Mahringer" <yeti201@gmx.at> wrote in message
news:OeTTe.8$F73.580679@news.salzburg-online.at...
Hi Nigel,
Nigel Walker wrote:
Could someone tell me the difference between the 63B09P and 63B09RP
Hitachi microprocessor chips or point me to a source of data?
Hm. Never heard of the "R" type on 63x09/68x09 processors.
Maybe it is just a mirrored pinning ("reverse").
HTH
Wolfgang
Thanks for the reply, Wolfang. I still haven't managed to find data. I
have several tubes of these things and they don't work on my 63B09P
board. I'm sure the required data must be somewhere on the web!
Have a look at Partminer. They list data for a 63B09EP, and 63B09ERP, so |
hopefully the difference bwteen the versions will be the same as between
the 63B09P, and 63B09RP.
I doubt if it is a pinout change, but might well be a revision to the
microcode.
Best Wishes |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Wolfgang Mahringer
Guest
|
Posted:
Wed Sep 14, 2005 12:35 am Post subject:
Re: Difference between 63B09P and 63B09RP? |
|
|
Hi Nigel,
Nigel Walker wrote:
| Quote: | "Wolfgang Mahringer" <yeti201@gmx.at> wrote in message
news:OeTTe.8$F73.580679@news.salzburg-online.at...
Hi Nigel,
...
Hm. Never heard of the "R" type on 63x09/68x09 processors.
Maybe it is just a mirrored pinning ("reverse").
Thanks for the reply, Wolfang. I still haven't managed to find data. I have
several tubes of these things and they don't work on my 63B09P board. I'm
sure the required data must be somewhere on the web!
|
The 63x09 has a very unique power supply pinning, IIRC pins 1 and 7.
You have lots of R-types. So why not just trying to hook up a
quartz, with VCC and Gnd on pins 40 and 34? If it oscillates,
it is indeed a reversed type.
Try it, you have nothing to lose.
BTW: the E-type mentioned on another answer has no oscillator
ciruit onboard, it needs an external quadrature clock (E and Q).
The E type is intended to be used as a slave processor.
HTH
Wolfgang
--
From-address is Spam trap
Use: wolfgang (dot) mahringer (at) sbg (dot) at |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Nigel Walker
Guest
|
Posted:
Wed Sep 14, 2005 1:42 pm Post subject:
Re: Difference between 63B09P and 63B09RP? |
|
|
| Quote: | The 63x09 has a very unique power supply pinning, IIRC pins 1 and 7.
You have lots of R-types. So why not just trying to hook up a
quartz, with VCC and Gnd on pins 40 and 34? If it oscillates,
it is indeed a reversed type.
Try it, you have nothing to lose.
BTW: the E-type mentioned on another answer has no oscillator
ciruit onboard, it needs an external quadrature clock (E and Q).
The E type is intended to be used as a slave processor.
HTH
Wolfgang
|
I think you are right Wolfgang. Unfortunately I have returned the chips now,
but I will certainly do that test if I get in the same position again.
Hopefully some 63B09P chips will be with me soon.
I'm thinking of re-designing the board to use a PIC due to the upcoming RoHS
requirements and the difficulty in getting obsolete chips. Of course the
software will have to be re-written but at least I will lose the external
EPROM and RAM.
Thanks for your suggestions.
Nigel. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Roger Hamlett
Guest
|
Posted:
Wed Sep 14, 2005 2:14 pm Post subject:
Re: Difference between 63B09P and 63B09RP? |
|
|
"Nigel Walker" <nawalker@softhome.net> wrote in message
news:e_CdnRPxIv_mf7reRVnyiw@eclipse.net.uk...
| Quote: |
The 63x09 has a very unique power supply pinning, IIRC pins 1 and 7.
You have lots of R-types. So why not just trying to hook up a
quartz, with VCC and Gnd on pins 40 and 34? If it oscillates,
it is indeed a reversed type.
Try it, you have nothing to lose.
BTW: the E-type mentioned on another answer has no oscillator
ciruit onboard, it needs an external quadrature clock (E and Q).
The E type is intended to be used as a slave processor.
HTH
Wolfgang
Yes. The point I was trying to make about the 'E', was that the website I |
mentioned, had data sheets for the ERP, and the EP variants, and a check
on these, should show exactly what the 'R' designation actually means.
| Quote: | I think you are right Wolfgang. Unfortunately I have returned the chips
now, but I will certainly do that test if I get in the same position
again. Hopefully some 63B09P chips will be with me soon.
I'm thinking of re-designing the board to use a PIC due to the upcoming
RoHS requirements and the difficulty in getting obsolete chips. Of
course the software will have to be re-written but at least I will lose
the external EPROM and RAM.
Thanks for your suggestions.
Nigel.
|
best Wishes |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
|
|